Bug#942055: ghostscript in buster partly broken on armel?

reassign 942055 cups-filters thanks Hi Jonas! * Jonas Smedegaard [200205 11:02]: > > I'm open for suggestion on how to continue next, but have honestly. If > > I should fill a bug against an other package, please let me know which > > one, as I have no idea, how these parts are interacting w

Bug#942055: ghostscript in buster partly broken on armel?

Hi! Am 2020-02-04 22:09, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard: Most notable change between 9.22 and 9.24 - and also applied to various degree in security updates - was a security fix affecting interpretation of Postscript code. Maybe a stupid question, but does that fix work? I'm just wondering, if t

Bug#942055: version in oldstable not affected

notfound 942055 9.26a~dfsg-0+deb9u5 thanks Version in oldstable is not affected by this regression.

Bug#942055: ghostscript in buster partly broken on armel?

reassign 942055 ghostscript severity 942055 important found 942055 9.27~dfsg-2+deb10u1 thanks Dear Maintainer, *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? I upgraded my server running on armel from stretch to buster. Sin

Bug#942055: cups-filters: ghostscript on armel partly broken?

reassign 942055 ghostscript severity 942055 important found 942055 9.27~dfsg-2+deb10u1 thanks Dear Maintainer, *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? I upgraded my server running on armel from stretch to buster. Sin