ghostscript_9.06~dfsg-1_srcall.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2014-08-26 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 19:08:41 -0700 Source: ghostscript Binary: ghostscript ghostscript-x ghostscript-doc libgs9 libgs9-common libgs-dev ghostscript-dbg Architecture: source all Version: 9.06~dfsg-1 Distribution: unstable

Bug#735612: marked as done (ghostscript-cups became useless and should be removed)

2014-08-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 27 Aug 2014 03:36:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#735612: fixed in ghostscript 9.06~dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #735612, regarding ghostscript-cups became useless and should be removed to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#745529: marked as done (Please drop lcms1)

2014-08-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 27 Aug 2014 03:36:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#745529: fixed in ghostscript 9.06~dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #745529, regarding Please drop lcms1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Bug#531624: marked as done (ghostscript should not use private libicc)

2014-08-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 27 Aug 2014 03:36:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#531624: fixed in ghostscript 9.06~dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #531624, regarding ghostscript should not use private libicc to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#717827: marked as done (ghostscript: please provide a staged build for ghostscript)

2014-08-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 27 Aug 2014 03:36:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#717827: fixed in ghostscript 9.06~dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #717827, regarding ghostscript: please provide a staged build for ghostscript to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Processing of ghostscript_9.06~dfsg-1_srcall.changes

2014-08-26 Thread Debian FTP Masters
ghostscript_9.06~dfsg-1_srcall.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: ghostscript-doc_9.06~dfsg-1_all.deb libgs9-common_9.06~dfsg-1_all.deb ghostscript_9.06~dfsg-1.dsc ghostscript_9.06~dfsg.orig.tar.gz ghostscript_9.06~dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Yo

Processing of ghostscript_9.06~dfsg-1_srcall.changes

2014-08-26 Thread Debian FTP Masters
ghostscript_9.06~dfsg-1_srcall.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: ghostscript-doc_9.06~dfsg-1_all.deb libgs9-common_9.06~dfsg-1_all.deb ghostscript_9.06~dfsg-1.dsc ghostscript_9.06~dfsg.orig.tar.gz ghostscript_9.06~dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz Greetings

Bug#723719: ghostscript: New Upstream Version 9.10 available

2014-08-26 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > Le lundi, 4 août 2014, 15.19:46 Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >> Plan forward >> >> >> 1a) Release 9.06 to unstable >> 1b) Prepare 9.14 >> 2) Release 9.10 to unstable when 9.06 is in testing > > I think we should rather focus on making 9.09 available

Bug#723719: ghostscript: New Upstream Version 9.10 available

2014-08-26 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Hi, Le lundi, 4 août 2014, 15.19:46 Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > 9.06 > > > Requires a SONAME bump and therefore a coordinated library transition. After discussing this with Julien Cristau, I've done the following: a) get the list of symbols dropped between stable and 9.06 b) verify which

Bug#758864: Reply to Didier's questions

2014-08-26 Thread Jim Cobley
On 26/08/14 20:09, Brian Potkin wrote: cat /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/eth0/disable_ipv6 First part:- root@jupiter2:~# cat /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/disable_ipv6 0 root@jupiter2:~# cat /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/default/disable_ipv6 0 root@jupiter2:~# cat /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/lo/disable_ipv6 0 ro

Bug#758864: Reply to Didier's questions

2014-08-26 Thread Brian Potkin
On Tue 26 Aug 2014 at 17:10:18 +0100, Jim Cobley wrote: > Tks Brian > > Have read Bug 758914 > Message 44 says fixed the install problem but "still have problem > with CUPS" which he is not worried about as he has other CUPS > servers he can use. > So I didn't have the fstab / mount problem but I

Bug#758864: Sudden thought about IPv6 and CUPS problem

2014-08-26 Thread Jim Cobley
I mentioned that the same problem with updating CUPS occured a few weeks ago. I think I have remembered that I had disabled IPv6 before the problem and soon after I found a reference to things not working if IPv6 was disabled. I have a funny feeling that I then enabled IPv6 again and the next u

Bug#758864: Reply to Didier's questions

2014-08-26 Thread Jim Cobley
Tks Brian Have read Bug 758914 Message 44 says fixed the install problem but "still have problem with CUPS" which he is not worried about as he has other CUPS servers he can use. So I didn't have the fstab / mount problem but I am no further forward with the CUPS issue which I am worried about

Bug#759348: cups-browsed: May hang for 30 seconds when restarted

2014-08-26 Thread Brian Potkin
Package: cups-browsed Version: 1.0.58-1 Severity: normal On an up-to-date unstable version 1.0.55-1 of cups-browsed was installed. The journalctl records are shown for three commands. All three commands completed successfully immediately. systemctl restart cups-browsed.service Aug 26 15:43:

Bug#758864: [j...@priorycomputers.com: Re: Bug#758864: Reply to Didier's questions]

2014-08-26 Thread Brian Potkin
Hello Jim, Don't forget to include #758864 in your replies. Regards, Brian. - Forwarded message from Jim Cobley - Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 23:44:48 +0100 From: Jim Cobley To: Brian Potkin Subject: Re: Bug#758864: Reply to Didier's questions User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64