Your message dated Sun, 19 Jan 2014 03:49:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#734140: fixed in hplip 3.14.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #734140,
regarding Package not installable because of foomatic-filters
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 13:56:10 +1100
Source: hplip
Binary: hplip hplip-data printer-driver-postscript-hp hplip-gui hplip-dbg
hplip-doc hpijs-ppds printer-driver-hpijs printer-driver-hpcups libhpmud0
libhpmud-dev libsane-hpaio
Architectur
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #hplip (3.14.1-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> #
> # * debian/control: Changed Depends/Recommends on foomatic-filters to
> #"cups-filters (>= 1.0.42) | foomatic-filters" as foomatic-rip has
> #moved to cups-filters from version 1.0.42 on (Cl
On 01/18/2014 02:57 PM, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Le vendredi, 17 janvier 2014, 19.26:50 Till Kamppeter a écrit :
>> For the debian/changelog I was also wondering why there were changes
>> in "git log" which are not represented by the debian/changelog. I do
>> not know how they got lost in my c
Quoting Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (2014-01-18 17:24:19)
> Le vendredi, 17 janvier 2014, 00.31:07 Adrian Bunk a écrit :
> > cups depends on cups-filters, which now conflicts with
> > ghostscript-cups since gstopxl and gstoraster moved there.
>
> Indeed. The attached patch implements this.
Thanks.
>
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 +patch
Bug #735612 [ghostscript-cups] ghostscript-cups became useless and should be
removed
Added tag(s) patch.
--
735612: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=735612
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
T
Control: tags -1 +patch
Le vendredi, 17 janvier 2014, 00.31:07 Adrian Bunk a écrit :
> Package: ghostscript-cups
> Version: 9.05~dfsg-8+b1
> Severity: serious
>
> cups depends on cups-filters, which now conflicts with
> ghostscript-cups since gstopxl and gstoraster moved there.
Indeed. The attac
Le vendredi, 17 janvier 2014, 19.26:50 Till Kamppeter a écrit :
> For the debian/changelog I was also wondering why there were changes
> in "git log" which are not represented by the debian/changelog. I do
> not know how they got lost in my copy of the repo (or how they did
> not make it into it).