Bug#694371: ghostscript: \CropBox on A3 paper- result unreadable to xpdf and evince

2012-11-25 Thread Nomen Nescio
Package: ghostscript Version: 8.71~dfsg2-9 Severity: normal The following LaTeX document initially displays fine with evince and xpdf, but after cropping it the resulting file is unusable. Example: ==[latex_a3_paper.tex]%<- \documentclass[12pt]{min

Processing of ghostscript_9.05~dfsg-6.3_amd64.changes

2012-11-25 Thread Debian FTP Masters
ghostscript_9.05~dfsg-6.3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: ghostscript_9.05~dfsg-6.3.dsc ghostscript_9.05~dfsg-6.3.debian.tar.gz ghostscript-doc_9.05~dfsg-6.3_all.deb libgs9-common_9.05~dfsg-6.3_all.deb ghostscript_9.05~dfsg-6.3_amd64.deb ghostscrip

Bug#520753: ghostscript: diff for NMU version 9.05~dfsg-6.3

2012-11-25 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Didier Raboud wrote: > I've prepared an NMU for ghostscript (versioned as 9.05~dfsg-6.3) and > uploaded it to DELAYED/1. Please feel free to tell me if I > should delay it longer. I personally prefer the one-line fix for wheezy due to simplicity. I think the "nic

Bug#694345: ghostscript: diff for NMU version 9.05~dfsg-6.3

2012-11-25 Thread Didier Raboud
Package: ghostscript Version: 9.05~dfsg-6.2 Severity: normal Tags: patch pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for ghostscript (versioned as 9.05~dfsg-6.3) and uploaded it (again, sorry) to DELAYED/1. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. diff -Nru ghostscript

Bug#682407: Ok for fixed in release

2012-11-25 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Le dimanche, 25 novembre 2012 17.46:16, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : > Didier you forget this one on the nmu. Care to redo? Yeah, saw it, and am currently rebuilding. Cheers. OdyX -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont

Bug#682407: Ok for fixed in release

2012-11-25 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Didier you forget this one on the nmu. Care to redo? Le 24 nov. 2012 15:21, "Bastien ROUCARIES" a écrit : > I have talk about this bug for debian release team particularly Mehdi > Dogguy at debian paris mini conf. It is ok to fix > for wheezy. > > Bastien > >

Processing of ghostscript_9.05~dfsg-6.3_amd64.changes

2012-11-25 Thread Debian FTP Masters
ghostscript_9.05~dfsg-6.3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: ghostscript_9.05~dfsg-6.3.dsc ghostscript_9.05~dfsg-6.3.debian.tar.gz ghostscript-doc_9.05~dfsg-6.3_all.deb libgs9-common_9.05~dfsg-6.3_all.deb ghostscript_9.05~dfsg-6.3_amd64.deb ghostscrip

Processed: ghostscript: diff for NMU version 9.05~dfsg-6.3

2012-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 520753 + pending Bug #520753 {Done: Michael Gilbert } [ghostscript-cups] postinst couldn't change to /etc/cups/pppd Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 520753: http://bugs.d

Bug#520753: ghostscript: diff for NMU version 9.05~dfsg-6.3

2012-11-25 Thread Didier Raboud
tags 520753 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for ghostscript (versioned as 9.05~dfsg-6.3) and uploaded it to DELAYED/1. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. diff -Nru ghostscript-9.05~dfsg/debian/changelog ghostscript-9.05~dfsg/debian/changelog

Bug#520753: Potential serious bug on ghostscript-cups

2012-11-25 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Le samedi, 24 novembre 2012 15.17:44, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > > I remembered this bug and noticed it was fixed, but "badly": do you > > intend to upload the "nice" cups-postinst-trigger solution to Wheezy? > > > > I still think