Bug#647868: hplip-cups: rasterizer fails on powerpc (endianness issue?)

Le vendredi, 3 août 2012 20.09:04, Vladimir Berezenko a écrit : > Package: hplip > Version: 3.12.6-3 > Followup-For: Bug #647868 > > Dear Maintainer, > > Almost same problem with HP OfficeJet Pro 8000. The HPLIP Printer Test Page > is printed with smeared colors. The vertical gradiend from W to K

Bug#647868: hplip-cups: rasterizer fails on powerpc (endianness issue?)

Package: hplip Version: 3.12.6-3 Followup-For: Bug #647868 Dear Maintainer, Almost same problem with HP OfficeJet Pro 8000. The HPLIP Printer Test Page is printed with smeared colors. The vertical gradiend from W to K is printed in some sort of pink color not BW. HP logo is not blue and white but

Bug#682426: Decrease severity

I won't play severity pingpong, but… Le vendredi, 3 août 2012 18.27:22, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : > Yes : > 1 does not affect thé whole package Almost any bug never does, that's not a criteria. > 2 lack of information about printer If that's the case, asking the bug reporter to actually provi

Bug#682426: Decrease severity

Yes : 1 does not affect thé whole package 2 lack of information about printer 3 moreinfo needed 4 does not seems to affect every user 5 does not break install Le 3 août 2012 18:23, "Didier Raboud" a écrit : > Le vendredi, 3 août 2012 18.10:53, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : > > Severity 682426 impor

Bug#682426: Decrease severity

Le vendredi, 3 août 2012 18.10:53, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : > Severity 682426 important > Thank Would you mind to justify why this would not be of RC severity? Cheers, OdyX -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

Processed: Decrease severity

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > Severity 682426 important Bug #682426 [ghostscript] cups: filter gs takes several minutes consuming 100 % of CPU Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' > Thank Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 682426: htt

Bug#682426: Decrease severity

Severity 682426 important Thank

Re: SpliX from Debian merged into Ubuntu

On 8 July 2012 15:06, Till Kamppeter wrote: > Hi, > > I have merged the newest Debian package of SpliX into Ubuntu. Following > changes I have done in Ubuntu and I recommend to get them also into the > Debian package to be able to use identical (source) packages in Debian and > Ubuntu: > Hi Till,

Re: First package of Ghostscript 9.06

On 12-08-03 at 02:18pm, Till Kamppeter wrote: > I have done another upload of Ghostscript 9.06 now > (9.06~dfsg~20120803-0ubuntu1). It has a new repackaging, leaving the > code of libopenjpeg in. I use the Ghostscript-shipped libopenjpeg as > the upstream developers of Ghostscri

Processed: Re: cups: filter gs takes several minutes consuming 100 % of CPU

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 682426 ghostscript 9.05~dfsg-6 Bug #682426 [cups] cups: filter gs takes several minutes consuming 100 % of CPU Bug reassigned from package 'cups' to 'ghostscript'. No longer marked as found in versions cups/1.5.3-2. Ignoring request to al

Re: First package of Ghostscript 9.06

I have done another upload of Ghostscript 9.06 now (9.06~dfsg~20120803-0ubuntu1). It has a new repackaging, leaving the code of libopenjpeg in. I use the Ghostscript-shipped libopenjpeg as the upstream developers of Ghostscript have done major changes on it and these changes did not make it

Re: cups: filter gs takes several minutes consuming 100 % of CPU

reassign 682426 ghostscript 9.05~dfsg-6 thanks Le mardi, 24 juillet 2012 21.31:02, Till Kamppeter a écrit : > The real bug here is a Ghostscript bug. Ghostscript is not able to > render a given input file in a reasonable time. This will be best fixed > by the upstream developers of Ghostscript. Th

Processed: Re: Bug#475873: Serious bug was config files left around after switch to ghostscript?

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 475873 +patch Bug #475873 [gs-gpl] gs-gpl: config files left around after switch to ghostscript Added tag(s) patch. > severity 475873 serious Bug #475873 [gs-gpl] gs-gpl: config files left around after switch to ghostscript Severity set to

Bug#475873: Serious bug was config files left around after switch to ghostscript?

tags 475873 +patch severity 475873 serious thanks Le vendredi, 3 août 2012 10.19:13, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : > I think this bug #475873 is serious, and should be fixed before stable. > > What do you think ? Indeed, rising severity. I think that has already been addressed in #333474 with a "

Bug#483086: Could we do something about this bug? was gs-common should be in oldlibs

hi, Could we do something about this bug asking to gs-common to be in oldlibs ? Thank you. Bastien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAE2SPAafmWmP

Bug#475873: Serious bug was config files left around after switch to ghostscript?

Hi, I think this bug #475873 is serious, and should be fixed before stable. What do you think ? It is a matter of dpkg-maintscript-helper rm_conffile file in the ghostscript maintener script. Bastien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsu

Bug#520753: Potential serious bug on ghostscript-cups

On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On 12-07-30 at 10:03pm, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Jonas Smedegaard >> wrote: >> > On 12-07-29 at 09:04pm, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: >> >> Le dimanche, 29 juillet 2012 18.03:16, Jonas Smedegaard a écr