Steven Chamberlain, on mer. 12 avril 2017 13:55:08 +0100, wrote:
> I expect there might be problems trying to build linux arches from a
> kfreebsd host. But we should try to find out, and then maybe fix it.
FWIW, I have been building hurd-i386 images from a linux box for a long
time without probl
Hello,
While at it:
python3-sphinx-gallery (>= 0.7.0) ,
I believe you meant
python3-sphinx-gallery (>= 0.7.0) ,
So that the python3-sphinx-gallery dep is disable when using the stage1
profile alone or when using the nodoc profile alone. Currently one has
to using
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, le jeu. 17 déc. 2020 23:47:42 +0100, a ecrit:
> You just solved that mystery for me. I was already starting to question
> my sanity when the --profile switch didn't work as expected :-).
It was driving me crazy in the past couple hours as well, I was
questioning the supp
Matt Turner, le Mon 15 Nov 2010 19:51:10 -0500, a écrit :
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > What's the actual problem --as-needed is trying to solve?
> >
> > The answer is mainly unwanted libraries being linked in as a result
> > of using pkg-config (and various other -conf
Steve Langasek, le Tue 16 Nov 2010 09:14:40 -0800, a écrit :
> I don't argue that this makes --as-needed *correct* as a default, but I
> think it's clear how using --as-needed may benefit a distribution in terms
> of reducing churn when library dependencies change.
We agree on the second part, but
Florian Weimer, le Tue 16 Nov 2010 19:49:57 +0100, a écrit :
> * Roland McGrath:
>
> >> I can't see why you think --as-needed is fundamentally wrong or
> >> unnecessary.
> >
> > It is fundamentally wrong because -lfoo means I demand that the
> > initializers of libfoo.so run, whether or not I cal
Andrzej P, le Wed 08 Dec 2010 21:41:16 +, a écrit :
>I used the default single partition setup suggested by 'partman'.
>I assume that the suggested partitioning is "correct". I was
>puzzled however that the suggested scheme includes a 2.5 GB swap
>space since the Installation M
c...@pop3.netunix.com, le Mon 13 Dec 2010 12:06:30 -, a écrit :
> On sparc there is a restriction which applies to older machines.
> If the disk was originally formatted on a machine with an old version of
> the OBP it will have a disk label which cannot support slices larger than
> 2Gb. If you
Kurt Roeckx, le Tue 26 Apr 2011 21:28:57 +0200, a écrit :
> Is there a reason not to switch the remaining (release) arches
> (ia64, kfreebsd-*, sparc, s390)? Maybe hurd-i386 too?
There's no real reason to defer hurd-i386, as it's basically like i386,
and the key packages (glibc/hurd/gnumach) alre
Matthias Klose, le Mon 06 May 2013 16:22:30 +0200, a écrit :
> - hurd never had openjdk support, and afaik, nobody is working on that.
There has been work towards this, notably by Jeremie Koenig. I don't
know the status, we just have not made it a strong priority so far.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRI
Hello,
One of the things that needs to get added for arm64 and ppc64el is the
installation manual bits. For now I have just commited the basics, so
you can
$ debcheckout installation-guide
$ cd installation-guide/build
$ ./buildone arm64 en pdf
$ ./buildone ppc64el en pdf
to get it built. What p
Hello,
I can only repeat what I have posted a couple of months ago: we do
need documentation in the manual about the arm64 and ppc64el new
architectures.
Samuel Thibault, le Tue 16 Sep 2014 14:11:01 +0200, a écrit :
> One of the things that needs to get added for arm64 and ppc64el is
Hello,
Breno Leitao, le Fri 10 Apr 2015 17:44:01 -0300, a écrit :
> On 04/09/2015 01:13 PM, Karsten Merker wrote:> Hello everybody,
> > the release date for Jessie is near, but the installation-guide
> > does not seem to contain any arm64/ppc64el-specific information
> > yet.
> We have created thi
Hello,
Mmm, the following looks like a useless addition:
Holger Wansing, le Sat 11 Apr 2015 17:13:06 +0200, a écrit :
> Index: en/boot-installer/powerpc.xml
> ===
> --- en/boot-installer/powerpc.xml (Revision 69729)
> +++ en/boot
Holger Wansing, le Sat 11 Apr 2015 17:13:06 +0200, a écrit :
> +arch_porturl="ppc64el"
> +arch_listname="ppc64el"
Please take care when updating these to be sure to understand
what they mean. http://www.debian.org/ports/ppc64el and
http://lists.debian.org/debian-ppc64el don't exist.
Samuel
--
Holger Wansing, le Sat 11 Apr 2015 20:22:49 +0200, a écrit :
> supports-floppy-boot - I think that arch has no floppy support
Does ppc64el supports booting from a USB stick?
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
Holger Wansing, le Sat 11 Apr 2015 21:20:37 +0200, a écrit :
> And: is there support for the graphical installer?
> As far as I can see, the images do not contain the graphical
> installer.
See the documentation we have for powerpc: we generate only the mini GTK
isos for it (on e.g.
http://ftp.nl.
Ben Hutchings, le Sun 12 Apr 2015 00:35:33 +0100, a écrit :
> On Sat, 2015-04-11 at 20:22 +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
> > supports-smp-sometimes - that generation of cpu will most likely
> > fully support smp, right?
> [...]
>
> Yes.
That's not the question here, see the
Samuel Thibault, le Sun 12 Apr 2015 20:36:22 +0200, a écrit :
> Holger Wansing, le Sat 11 Apr 2015 20:22:49 +0200, a écrit :
> > supports-floppy-boot - I think that arch has no floppy support
>
> Does ppc64el supports booting from a USB stick?
More precisely, at the moment t
Holger Wansing, le Sat 11 Apr 2015 17:13:06 +0200, a écrit :
> All that contained in attached patch for review.
> The manual builds fine with it.
Thanks, I have fixed a couple more things and commited it.
Cyril, when should we upload an updated installation guide to be ready
for RC3?
Samuel
--
Ben Hutchings, le Sun 12 Apr 2015 20:27:29 +0100, a écrit :
> On Sun, 2015-04-12 at 20:45 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Ben Hutchings, le Sun 12 Apr 2015 00:35:33 +0100, a écrit :
> > > On Sat, 2015-04-11 at 20:22 +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
> > > > supports-smp-
Aurelien Jarno, le Sun 12 Apr 2015 22:08:44 +0200, a écrit :
> On 2015-04-12 20:22, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Since petitboot runs inside a running linux kernel, that only shifts the
> > problem of booting that linux kernel :)
>
> Petitboot is the default bootloader
Ben Hutchings, le Sun 12 Apr 2015 23:13:34 +0100, a écrit :
> I've fixed these values (I hope) for armhf, arm64, mips and mipsel based
> on the current kernel configurations.
Thanks!
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
Breno Leitao, le Mon 13 Apr 2015 10:04:29 -0300, a écrit :
> Sorry, I answered your email twice regarding this topic and never heard back.
>
> I answered it initially in 2014-11-29[1] and later in 2014-12-18[2]. In both
> cases
> I told about our patches to this repository.
I'm not subscribed to
24 matches
Mail list logo
