On 05-Jun-02 23:03, Paul Brossier wrote:
> I have also tried to install a pppc64 chroot as explained in
> http://debian-ppc64.alioth.debian.org/READ_ME , but:
>
> sudo debootstrap --arch ppc64 \
> --exclude=gcc-3.3-base,libstdc++5,libdb3 \
> --include=gcc-4.0-base,libstdc++6 \
> sarge ppc64.chr
nks. There is no mailing list yet. Your mail is the first one I got
regarding the ppc64 port. If there is sufficient demand,
someone should apply for a debian-ppc64 mailing list, I guess.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
s, I have patched Debian glibc up to current
CVS. I had to sort out which of the 120 Debian patches still apply
and found that about 90 of them are already in CVS or not needed anymore.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
On 04-Dec-08 11:34, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 11:03:37AM +0100, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> > For my ppc64 porting efforts, I have patched Debian glibc up to current
> > CVS. I had to sort out which of the 120 Debian patches still apply
> > and found that
for the
issues and decided to directly upgrade to the cvs version. This is
certainly not the only possible way, but at the moment it seemed to be
the easiest way for me. Of course I agree that if there is a smaller
patch which works, we should try to merge that one first.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
debian powerpc people have only access to 32bit powerpc
> machines, a pure64 port is definitively _NOT_ simpler.
Maybe I misunderstand something here. You are suggesting that people
without access to ppc64 hardware will (should?) do the ppc64 port?
This must be a joke?
Regards
Andreas Jochens
On 04-Dec-08 15:36, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 03:31:09PM +0100, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> > On 04-Dec-08 11:32, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 09:37:05PM -0200, Rafael Esp?ndola wrote:
> > > > I agree that it is very important to b
roject.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
st there ?
I did not yet request for a debian-ppc64 mailing list. Maybe you could
do that if you think that this is appropriate?
Regards
Andreas Jochens
On 04-Dec-08 16:44, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 04:24:02PM +0100, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> Fully unaware that others are doing a similar effort, and without contacting
> the debian gcc, glibc and kernel folk, right ?
I did not know and I still do not know about an
ce for a new port really so critical today?
Regards
Andreas Jochens
On 04-Dec-08 20:12, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 07:38:07PM +0100, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> > I hope that you will succeed with this plan. A ppc64 kernel in sarge
> > would of course make things _much_ easier for any 64 bit porting efforts
> > regardless o
On 04-Dec-08 21:27, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 08:51:11PM +0100, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> When was that, and why did you not help out making sure debian-installer
> worked on your hardware ?
Last time I tried was a few weeks ago. I did not even come to the point
On 04-Dec-08 22:27, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 10:00:09PM +0100, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> > On 04-Dec-08 21:27, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 08:51:11PM +0100, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> > > When was that, and why did you not help out m
6-powerpc' and 'libc6-dev-powerpc'
which contain the 32 bit libc files for ppc64.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
_LANG=java
Do you have any idea how to fix the java FTBFS?
Thank you for your work.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
oo has a newer bintuils and that may make a difference.
I will patch 'binutils' up to a newer version and then try it again.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/gcc-3.4-3.4.3/debian/control ./debian/control
--- ../tmp-orig/gcc-3.4-3.4.3/debian/control2004-12-13 07:41:25.632
r here and I have no idea what it means or how to fix
it. Nevertheless, I am still trying to build a newer binutils packages,
even if I do not know if this will help.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
dified patch and upload a new version to the
alioth archive soon.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
but it still said something
about TOC overflow.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
ies are
in /usr/lib64. In other words this would mean to change the name of
the well established '/usr/lib' hierarchy to '/usr/lib64'.
This would be ugly, at least IMHO.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
package (maybe after sarge).
>
> The second file is a update of Andreas patch to gcc-3.4.3-5 that also uses
> "detect-output-format.dpatch".
Thanks for the new patch. I am just uploading new gcc-3.4 and gcc-4.0
packages which use your new detection mechanism to the ppc64 archive
on alioth.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
at the moment, but there is still
more than enough space to hold some copies of the gcc and kernel
packages. As a member of the debian-ppc64 project you can just create
a new subdirectory of http://debian-ppc64.alioth.debian.org and upload
your packages there.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
23 matches
Mail list logo
