> i am disgusted. ...
>
> Dear fellow powerpc folk, this clearly means that the debian support for
> powerpc is dead or almost so, and i strongly recomend you to go find another
> distribution to run which cares a bit more about the powerpc architecture.
I'd rather prefer
* Toni L. Harbaugh-Blackford [Contr] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060427 13:53]:
> On Thu, 27 Apr 2006, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060427 13:23]:
> > > Dear fellow powerpc folk, this clearly means that the debian support for
> > > powerpc
ld still prevent that bad things remain.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
d
http://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2006/03/msg00490.html confirms
that.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060427 17:03]:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 04:52:09PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060427 15:05]:
> > > Andreas, do you have an explanation of why d-i commit access was taken
> > > from
> > >
ed on beliefs?
Hey, that would be violating the rules of a flame fest. :)
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Lennart Sorensen (lsore...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca) [120523 21:21]:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 07:42:32PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > I am still a regular powerpc user, and I should have sufficient time to
> > assist with porting issues for the foreseeable future, which I haven't
> > done for the la
* Aurelien Jarno (aure...@debian.org) [140908 14:20]:
> bacula #758125 ftbfs (libtool)
> deborphan #735010 ftbfs (libtool)
> subversion #727295 build-dep indirectly on exiv2, which ftbfs (libtool)
fixed / installed.
> git#727295 build-dep indirectly on exiv2, whic
* Andreas Barth (a...@ayous.org) [140908 14:23]:
> > git#727295 build-dep indirectly on exiv2, which ftbfs (libtool)
>
> now FTBFS on it's own in the testsuite, test-build on amd64 for
> comparison running, bug report will follow.
Still works on amd64, ppc64el s
* Andreas Barth (a...@ayous.org) [140908 14:23]:
> * Aurelien Jarno (aure...@debian.org) [140908 14:20]:
> > emacs23#749530 build-dep on libotf, which ftbfs (libtool)
build-depends on libtiff-dev which isn't in the archive anymore (at
least not for new architectures).
Hi,
status update, we have these 4 left:
* Aurelien Jarno (aure...@debian.org) [140908 14:20]:
> bzr#760054 ftbfs (non ppc64el specific) #760054
I'm not sure if we still need bzr on new systems.
> emacs23#749530 build-dep on libotf, which ftbfs (libtool)
build-depends on
Hi together,
just a short pointer, we will have a bof for 32bit architectures to
discussion issues affecting all (like packages gets larger and larger
and so there are build issues coming up).
The bof is planned for Thursday from 14-15 at the Debconf, room
allocation will follow.
Anyone interess
12 matches
Mail list logo
