Hi,
The wiki page that synthesizes architecture specificities indicates
that Altivec is included in the baseline for the ppc64 port:
https://wiki.debian.org/ArchitectureSpecificsMemo#ppc64
However my understanding is that this port supports any powerpc64 CPU,
including some that don’t have Altive
Hi Sébastien,
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 2:04 PM Sébastien Villemot wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The wiki page that synthesizes architecture specificities indicates
> that Altivec is included in the baseline for the ppc64 port:
> https://wiki.debian.org/ArchitectureSpecificsMemo#ppc64
>
> However my understan
Hi Mathieu,
Le mardi 13 juillet 2021 à 18:56 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
>
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 2:04 PM Sébastien Villemot
> wrote:
> >
> > The wiki page that synthesizes architecture specificities indicates
> > that Altivec is included in the baseline for the ppc64 port:
> > https
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 7:21 PM Sébastien Villemot wrote:
>
> Hi Mathieu,
>
> Le mardi 13 juillet 2021 à 18:56 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 2:04 PM Sébastien Villemot
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > The wiki page that synthesizes architecture specificities indicates
Le mardi 13 juillet 2021 à 20:06 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 7:21 PM Sébastien Villemot
> wrote:
> > Le mardi 13 juillet 2021 à 18:56 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 2:04 PM Sébastien Villemot
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
Hi Sébastien!
On 7/13/21 1:55 PM, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> The wiki page that synthesizes architecture specificities indicates
> that Altivec is included in the baseline for the ppc64 port:
> https://wiki.debian.org/ArchitectureSpecificsMemo#ppc64
>
> However my understanding is that this port
On 7/13/21 6:56 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> I do not believe that you can do much as a packager. You cannot assume
> anything on the target arch. You need to do the same thing as ffmpeg
> is doing for avx2/sse4 on amd64, you need to do runtime detection. So
> unless upstream is doing something v
Hi,
>> I am however not sure that my current choices for the ppc64 and powerpc
>> baselines are optimal, hence this thread.
If i can help you i'll be happy to. I have several Powermac G5 running
current Debian i can use one to test your packages as long as you tell
me please a little about the
Hi,
On Tue, 13 Jul 2021, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > However my understanding is that this port supports any powerpc64 CPU,
> > including some that don’t have Altivec (e.g. POWER4 or POWER5). This
> > is also what the main wiki page for PPC64 says:
> > https://wiki.debian.org/PPC64
> >
>
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 2:20 PM Sébastien Villemot wrote:
>
> Le mardi 13 juillet 2021 à 20:06 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
> > On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 7:21 PM Sébastien Villemot
> > wrote:
> > > Le mardi 13 juillet 2021 à 18:56 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Ju
> On 13. Jul 2021, at 21:05, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> wrote:
>
> Hi Sébastien!
>
>> On 7/13/21 1:55 PM, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
>> The wiki page that synthesizes architecture specificities indicates
>> that Altivec is included in the baseline for the ppc64 port:
>> https://wiki.debian.
> On 13. Jul 2021, at 21:44, Karoly Balogh wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 13 Jul 2021, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>
>>> However my understanding is that this port supports any powerpc64 CPU,
>>> including some that don’t have Altivec (e.g. POWER4 or POWER5). This
>>> is also what the main
Hi
On 13/07/2021 21:35, Karoly Balogh wrote:
> Just to note it here, this CPU family is also used by some relatively
> recent desktop-class PowerPC machines, like A-Eon's AmigaOne X5000 (and
> its "CyrusPlus" motherboard). So it's not just about the support of some
> obscure embedded dev board.
13 matches
Mail list logo
