Hi Adrian,
I sent you a private email twice last week but I did not receive any
answer from you so I am afraid they did not reach you. Or maybe you were
just away or not available, if that's the case sorry for spaming you...
Meanwhile I commited a fix upstream
(https://github.com/fw4spl-org/camp/
Hello!
On 04/16/2018 09:15 AM, Flavien Bridault wrote:
I sent you a private email twice last week but I did not receive any
answer from you so I am afraid they did not reach you. Or maybe you were
just away or not available, if that's the case sorry for spaming you...
I forgot to follow up on
On 04/16/2018 11:16 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Meanwhile I commited a fix upstream
(https://github.com/fw4spl-org/camp/pull/2) so I would just want to try
it before proposing the fix in the package.
I'll test that for you on s390x.
That patch doesn't apply to the Debian version of ca
Weird, it applies well for me on the master branch of the debian
repository. Try the patch attached to this email or directly this link
https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/fw4spl-org/camp/pull/2.diff
Le 16/04/2018 à 11:21, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
> On 04/16/2018 11:16 AM, Jo
On 04/16/2018 11:58 AM, Flavien Bridault wrote:
Weird, it applies well for me on the master branch of the debian
repository. Try the patch attached to this email or directly this link
https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/fw4spl-org/camp/pull/2.diff
Tried to apply against the current pa
Sorry the patch is ofc meant to be applied on the raw upstream, not
after debian patches being applied. I was applying it directly into the
git repo so that's why I did not have any issue. If you want to keep
trying it this way, I attached a rebased version of the patch that
should apply well on to
On 04/16/2018 02:21 PM, Flavien Bridault wrote:
Sorry the patch is ofc meant to be applied on the raw upstream, not
after debian patches being applied. I was applying it directly into the
git repo so that's why I did not have any issue. If you want to keep
trying it this way, I attached a rebased
Ok great, as soon as the merge request is accepted upstream, which
should happen very soon, I'll propose the update.
Thanks a lot for testing this.
Le 16/04/2018 à 14:34, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
> On 04/16/2018 02:21 PM, Flavien Bridault wrote:
>> Sorry the patch is ofc meant to be ap
Hi guys,
This looks ok for me now, I updated to 0.8.2 which includes the fix
proposal. Please upload if that looks ok for you.
Cheers,
Le 16/04/2018 à 14:47, Flavien Bridault a écrit :
> Ok great, as soon as the merge request is accepted upstream, which
> should happen very soon, I'll propose t
On 12/04/18 01:39 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
On 05/04/18 01:24 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 04/05/2018 12:01 AM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
So there we see "--disable-libquadmath --disable-libquadmath-support".
damn. :-(
Please file a bug report against Debian's gcc-5, gcc-6, gcc-7 and
>
> Working on it :
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=895452
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82686
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2018-04/msg01351.html
nix$ cat pq.c
#define _XOPEN_SOURCE 600
/* #include */
#include
#include
#include
#include
11 matches
Mail list logo
