On Sat, 23 Nov 2013, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> During a discussion about architecture qualification, the release team
> concluded that it would be interesting to have a better way to track
> architecture-specific bugs. It would be nice to have BTS tags for each
> architecture that is currently in the
On 23 November 2013 21:53, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Nov 2013, Ivo De Decker wrote:
>> During a discussion about architecture qualification, the release team
>> concluded that it would be interesting to have a better way to track
>> architecture-specific bugs. It would be nice to have BTS
Don Armstrong dixit:
>These are the list of ports that I see:
Question is, where do you see them?
>avr32
This one got removed even from debian-ports for several
reasons.
>sh
I think there's sh4 but not just sh.
Looking at the buildd pages is probably the best idea.
Combining https://buildd.d
On 11/23/2013 10:53 PM, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Nov 2013, Ivo De Decker wrote:
>> During a discussion about architecture qualification, the release team
>> concluded that it would be interesting to have a better way to track
>> architecture-specific bugs. It would be nice to have BTS tags
On 11/23/2013 11:51 PM, Helge Deller wrote:
>> What else am I missing?
>
> Please add "hppa"
Assuming that you are one of the hppa guys, how is the port doing? Any
chance that the buildds will be up and running again anytime soon?
Cheers,
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : De
On 11/24/2013 12:21 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 11/23/2013 11:51 PM, Helge Deller wrote:
>> Please add "hppa"
>
> Assuming that you are one of the hppa guys, how is the port doing? Any
> chance that the buildds will be up and running again anytime soon?
Yes, think so.
I'm working on
On 11/24/2013 12:22 AM, Helge Deller wrote:
> On 11/24/2013 12:21 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> On 11/23/2013 11:51 PM, Helge Deller wrote:
>>> Please add "hppa"
>>
>> Assuming that you are one of the hppa guys, how is the port doing? Any
>> chance that the buildds will be up and running
On 11/24/2013 12:47 AM, John David Anglin wrote:
> On 23-Nov-13, at 6:35 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>
>> Crossing my fingers! It's been sad to see the number of up-to-date
>> packages in hppa dropping over the time.
>
> It should be going up now.
So, the buildds are already up and runn
On 23-Nov-13, at 6:35 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Crossing my fingers! It's been sad to see the number of up-to-date
packages in hppa dropping over the time.
It should be going up now.
Dave
--
John David Anglin dave.ang...@bell.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 5:53 AM, Don Armstrong wrote:
> These are the list of ports that I see:
I would strongly suggest not hardcoding this list and instead
harvesting the Architecture fields of the Release files for oldstable
-> experimental on ftp.d.o, ftp.d-p.o and maybe archive.d.o.
We have
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz dixit:
>On 11/24/2013 12:47 AM, John David Anglin wrote:
>> It should be going up now.
>
>So, the buildds are already up and running? Shouldn't they be showing
>up on buildd.debian-ports.org [1]?
I think I saw buildd uploads for hppa on incoming.d.o this week.
Paul Wi
On 11/24/2013 01:20 AM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> John Paul Adrian Glaubitz dixit:
>> So, the buildds are already up and running? Shouldn't they be showing
>> up on buildd.debian-ports.org [1]?
>
> I think I saw buildd uploads for hppa on incoming.d.o this week.
Indeed:
> http://incoming.debian-p
On Sun, 24 Nov 2013, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 5:53 AM, Don Armstrong wrote:
>
> > These are the list of ports that I see:
>
> I would strongly suggest not hardcoding this list and instead
> harvesting the Architecture fields of the Release files for oldstable
> -> experimental o
On 11/23/13 4:35 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 11/24/2013 12:22 AM, Helge Deller wrote:
On 11/24/2013 12:21 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 11/23/2013 11:51 PM, Helge Deller wrote:
Please add "hppa"
Assuming that you are one of the hppa guys, how is the port doing? Any
chan
On 23/11/2013 22:53, Don Armstrong wrote:
> kfreebsd-amd64
> kfreebsd-i386
Most of the bugs affecting one of these also affect the other. I think
it makes sense to add a single tag to cover both.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
15 matches
Mail list logo
