Hi all,
some days ago lynuxworks.com guys made an announcement about their port
of uml on ppc32; after that Jeff Dike has received this work,
you can read his article on usermodelinux.org (there's also a patch
for uml on ppc64).
As you can see in Jeff's article the code he has received is a 28MB
t
Just wanted to verify if my fix has been included. Looks like it might
have fallen between the cracks. If needed I can repost it.
Thanks,
Martin
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 03:18:45PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-01-08 at 00:00 +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 07, 2005
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 02:39:48PM -0800, Brad Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 10:13:17AM -0500, Pedro Sanchez wrote:
> > 4. /target/etc/yaboot.config (as installed by the d-i):
> >
> > boot=/dev/sdb2
> > device=/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> This last line seems odd. My G5 has
According to the following BTS entry, the ALSA maintainer assigned to the
snd-powermac driver doesn't even have any Mac to play with:
https://bugtrack.alsa-project.org/alsa-bug/view.php?id=306
This prooves that all attempts at fixing the driver have been shooting in
the dark. No f* wonder th
ben mentioned some thoughts he had on improving the
driver, many of which (or mainly from what i read)
involved dividing up the driver into
chipset groups... something like that
as obviously not every mac has the same sound hardware
but for some wierd reason we just have an all in one
driver (which
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 02:21:33PM +0200, Martin-Ãric Racine wrote:
> According to the following BTS entry, the ALSA maintainer assigned to the
> snd-powermac driver doesn't even have any Mac to play with:
>
> https://bugtrack.alsa-project.org/alsa-bug/view.php?id=306
>
> This prooves that all at
I've got the auctex package (advanced tex/latex mode for emacs) on
several boxes and it works just fine on the x86 boxes but on my iBook it
fails with the error:
File mode specification error: (error "Lisp nesting exceeds
max-lisp-eval-depth")
There are also numerous such errors in the installati
Hi!
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 02:21:33PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
>
> Wouldn't it be a good idea to place a bounty to encourage Ubuntu PPC
> developers to get around fixing snd-powermac for all Mac PPC chips?
Sorry but I failed to parse your message.
Are the Ubuntu people setting a bounty
On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 11:10 +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 02:39:48PM -0800, Brad Boyer wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 10:13:17AM -0500, Pedro Sanchez wrote:
> > > 4. /target/etc/yaboot.config (as installed by the d-i):
> > >
> > > boot=/dev/sdb2
> > > device=/[EMAIL
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 12:49:31AM +1100, Dean Hamstead wrote:
> ben mentioned some thoughts he had on improving the
> driver, many of which (or mainly from what i read)
> involved dividing up the driver into
> chipset groups... something like that
> as obviously not every mac has the same sound ha
hi,
on my ibook g3 it seems to work without problem (though there might be
problems that i havent encountered yet), versions are the same:
ii auctex 11.54-2 An integrated environment for...
ii emacs21 21.3+1-8The GNU Emacs editor
cheers float
On Fri, Feb 04,
[Copy by mail since I don't know whether posting to the Usenet mirror
will propagate back to the list]
James Tappin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've got the auctex package (advanced tex/latex mode for emacs) on
> several boxes and it works just fine on the x86 boxes but on my iBook it
> fails
Rather than complainting, maybe someone can offer access to their
Mac. Either physical or via ssh. Usually the real guru's don't need
much time to put things right. (having said that, the cleanup Ben
suggested would be a big effort)
I use the powermac driver on 2.6.8 with ALSA 1.0.4 and it works f
They should get macs period. I know of one ppc dev that doesn't even
have a mac. Apple has to be the largest subset of ppc, certainly
commercially. That is reason enough to have their dev work and test
things out on macs. I can't even started to get them testing for the
DRI bug I have with
On 04 Feb 2005 at 16h02, Martin Habets wrote:
Hi,
> Rather than complainting, maybe someone can offer access to their
> Mac. Either physical or via ssh. Usually the real guru's don't need
> much time to put things right. (having said that, the cleanup Ben
> suggested would be a big effort)
Ben
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005, Jesus Climent wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 02:21:33PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> >
> > Wouldn't it be a good idea to place a bounty to encourage Ubuntu PPC
> > developers to get around fixing snd-powermac for all Mac PPC chips?
>
> Sorry but I failed to parse your
On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 16:13:47 +0100
David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
DK>
DK> [Copy by mail since I don't know whether posting to the Usenet
DK> mirror will propagate back to the list]
DK>
DK> James Tappin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DK>
DK> > I've got the auctex package (advanced tex/lat
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 09:42:45AM -0500, Pedro Sanchez wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 11:10 +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 02:39:48PM -0800, Brad Boyer wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 10:13:17AM -0500, Pedro Sanchez wrote:
> > > > 4. /target/etc/yaboot.config (as i
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 03:22:40PM +0100, Jesus Climent wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 02:21:33PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> >
> > Wouldn't it be a good idea to place a bounty to encourage Ubuntu PPC
> > developers to get around fixing snd-powermac for all Mac PPC chips?
All Ma
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 03:22:40PM +0100, Jesus Climent wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 02:21:33PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > >
> > > Wouldn't it be a good idea to place a bounty to encourage Ubuntu PPC
> > > developers to get around fix
On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 20:00 +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 09:42:45AM -0500, Pedro Sanchez wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 11:10 +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 02:39:48PM -0800, Brad Boyer wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 10:13:17AM -05
Hi All
Here:
$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
cpu : 7455, altivec supported
clock : 867MHz
revision: 3.2 (pvr 8001 0302)
bogomips: 865.18
machine : PowerBook3,5
motherboard : PowerBook3,5 MacRISC2 MacRISC Power Macintosh
detected as : 8
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 03:28:26PM -0500, Pedro Sanchez wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 20:00 +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 09:42:45AM -0500, Pedro Sanchez wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 11:10 +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 02:39:48PM
> Hey, you're the expert :-) I'll take your word over mine any day (I've
> used powerpc linux exactly 6 weeks).
>
> I was under the impression that if the boot strap partition went after
> the Mac OS X partition then Mac OS X "de-blessed" all but itself. Am I
> wrong there?
Nope, the only differ
Wouldn't it be a good idea to place a bounty to encourage Ubuntu PPC
developers to get around fixing snd-powermac for all Mac PPC chips?
Sorry but I failed to parse your message.
Are the Ubuntu people setting a bounty? Or you want us to set a bounty so that
Ubuntu people can fix the problem and g
I remember I always got a pop thru my speakers every once in a while.
The volume settings where seemed to be somewhat "unlevel" too as using
kde's mixer always jumped my volume to a somewhat loud volume as the
volume increased.
mauro
On Fri, 2005-04-02 at 22:25 +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
>
There is no such thing as suse ppc and there hasn't been for a few
versions. Things have to get tested after porting because things are
not always a simple matter of porting as the start of this thread
already suggests.
On Sat, 2005-05-02 at 13:08 +1100, Dean Hamstead wrote:
> >>Wouldn't it b
im talking about suse supporting alsa
Dean
Mauro wrote:
There is no such thing as suse ppc and there hasn't been for a few
versions. Things have to get tested after porting because things are
not always a simple matter of porting as the start of this thread
already suggests.
On Sat, 2005-05-02
I guess my point is that it does matter who fixes alsa for it to be
usable for ppc. I agree in part it should not matter, to a point. It
should definitely be a ppc distro if not debian/ubuntu.
On Sat, 2005-05-02 at 14:25 +1100, Dean Hamstead wrote:
> im talking about suse supporting alsa
>
>
>
i see your point, but if someone wants to fix it on intel
and it works on ppc they can go for it
what other ppc dists are there? deb, ubuntu, crux?
Dean
Mauro wrote:
I guess my point is that it does matter who fixes alsa for it to be
usable for ppc. I agree in part it should not matter, to a point
sure, but the original post says that this is not working out.
As far as ppc *nixes:
There is also mandrake-ppc which is now only a volunteer project, yellow
dog, fedora-ppc, source mage, gentoo, rock linux and that's just linux.
On the bsd front there is open and net, and they are working on a
F
31 matches
Mail list logo
