On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 10:10:07PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
>
> Short of recompiling with the port 879 bind/listen disabled? No. And I
> don't think this is required. I'm in no mood to summarize the argument on
> that point again - pmud is only accessible to the local user, and it
> _should_
> > Short of recompiling with the port 879 bind/listen disabled? No. And I
> > don't think this is required. I'm in no mood to summarize the argument on
> > that point again - pmud is only accessible to the local user, and it
> > _should_ be accessible to the local user. If you can't trust the loca
Hi Stephan,
Just thought you should be aware of a discussion on the debian-powerpc mailing
list about your pmud utility. For the full thread, see the list archives
available from the debian website (www.debian.org). Thanks..
On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 11:36:46AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> >
Yes, pmud is insecure... but it only allows connections from the
localhost. Now that don't mean a thing, as someone - not the console
user - can login and have the machine sleep. There are however more
security implications in pmud. For example, there is some crude checking
on the ownership and per
>Ok, but I'm not the maintainer. In fact, it looks like Joel Klecker
>is listed as the maintainer
>
>I'd be willing to take over this package, as soon as the DAM creates
>my account etc. (I'm almost through the NM process).
>
>Where do you put the upstream source for pmud. I looked at the url
> >I'd be willing to take over this package, as soon as the DAM creates
> >my account etc. (I'm almost through the NM process).
> >
> >Where do you put the upstream source for pmud. I looked at the url
> >listed in the debian/copyright file in the current debian package for
> >pmud, and that just
6 matches
Mail list logo
