Now, I checked the bug list, and it says that the dependency problem for
apache-common on "perl" has been fixed, with apache-common_1.3.6-14.
Message date was July 12th.
So is the autobuilder just not doing its job? Or are there other
concerns why it hasn't been put into our unstable distribution?
On Tue, Aug 10, 1999 at 07:10:56PM -0600, Jeremiah Merkl wrote:
> Now, I checked the bug list, and it says that the dependency problem for
> apache-common on "perl" has been fixed, with apache-common_1.3.6-14.
> Message date was July 12th.
What stops You from using apache_1.3.6-13 ?
And if You ar
Hi,
Please, what is the status for this machine?
Where are the instructions for installing the system?
Sergio
On Wed, Aug 11, 1999 at 10:39:02AM -0600, Jason E. Stewart wrote:
> Hey Robert,
>
> I'm writing this because you may not realize that your reply to
> Jeremiah was a little harsh and flip. Maybe you guys know each other,
oops! I *really* didn't realize that and i really didn't mean to
irritat
I'll try to be a little clearer.
Robert Ramiega wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 10, 1999 at 07:10:56PM -0600, Jeremiah Merkl wrote:
> > Now, I checked the bug list, and it says that the dependency problem for
> > apache-common on "perl" has been fixed, with apache-common_1.3.6-14.
> > Message date was Jul
> > On Tue, Aug 10, 1999 at 07:10:56PM -0600, Jeremiah Merkl wrote:
> > > Now, I checked the bug list, and it says that the dependency problem for
> > > apache-common on "perl" has been fixed, with apache-common_1.3.6-14.
> > > Message date was July 12th.
> > What stops You from using apache_1.3.6
On Wed, Aug 11, 1999 at 01:04:01PM -0600, Jeremiah Merkl wrote:
> I was just hoping that someone who knew for sure would be able to reply.
> I'm assuming if the autobuilder fails to build a package, SOMEone gets
> notified. Then the question becomes, who does anything get done about
> it. :)
Hart
7 matches
Mail list logo
