Re: xfs,powerpc, gcc (was Re: RaiserFS PPC status)

2001-05-08 Thread Just a friendly Jedi Knight
On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 09:52:11AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > This one bites me a bit. O_DIRECT is missing from bits/fcntl.h on powerpc > > (at least on my installation and i sure i didn't mess with libc6-dev). It's > > sid/unstable branch. I don't remeber if the intel box i compiled xfspro

Re: xfs,powerpc, gcc (was Re: RaiserFS PPC status)

2001-05-08 Thread Michel Dänzer
Just a friendly Jedi Knight wrote: On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 04:27:18PM +0200, Just a friendly Jedi Knight wrote: === mkfile === gcc -g -DDEBUG -funsigned-char -Wall -I../include '-DVERSION="1.2.4"' -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DXFS_BIG_FILES=1 -DXFS_BIG_FILESYSTEMS=1 -c -o xfs_mkf

Re: xfs,powerpc, gcc (was Re: RaiserFS PPC status)

2001-05-07 Thread Jason E. Stewart
"Just a friendly Jedi Knight" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 05:04:32PM -0600, Jason E. Stewart wrote: > > "Just a friendly Jedi Knight" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > Anyway if there is somone outthere willing to try powerpc xfsprogs please > > > point your apt-ge

Re: xfs,powerpc, gcc (was Re: RaiserFS PPC status)

2001-05-07 Thread Just a friendly Jedi Knight
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 05:04:32PM -0600, Jason E. Stewart wrote: > "Just a friendly Jedi Knight" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Anyway if there is somone outthere willing to try powerpc xfsprogs please > > point your apt-get at > > > > deb ftp://ftp.plukwa.net/debian-local sid main > > I

Re: xfs,powerpc, gcc (was Re: RaiserFS PPC status)

2001-05-07 Thread Jason E. Stewart
"Just a friendly Jedi Knight" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Anyway if there is somone outthere willing to try powerpc xfsprogs please > point your apt-get at > > deb ftp://ftp.plukwa.net/debian-local sid main I would like to but your server is not responding to ftp requests... jas.

Re: xfs,powerpc, gcc (was Re: RaiserFS PPC status)

2001-05-07 Thread Just a friendly Jedi Knight
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 04:27:18PM +0200, Just a friendly Jedi Knight wrote: > Nathan Scott from SGI send me patch but it didn't work. I now figured some > other way to fix that and it seems it partially worked (now it quits with: It looks like my "fix" made the trick (i mailed my solution to Na