Re: xfree86 4.1.0-0pre1v1 for powerpc at X Strike Force repository

2001-06-15 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, Michel Dänzer wrote: > Derek Homeier wrote: > > BTW, what is the great advantage of Xkb over just using the console > > keymaps anyway? Personally, I've disabled Xkb practically since i switched > > from Xpmac to XfreeFBDev, to have only one keymap to struggle with, and > > thi

Re: xfree86 4.1.0-0pre1v1 for powerpc at X Strike Force repository

2001-06-14 Thread Josh Huber
Peter Cordes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Can you get ADB keyboards with a caps lock that I can set to Control_L, or > should I just get a USB PCI card and USB keyboard? I'm sure they're obscenely expensive by themselves, but the new apple pro usb keyboards that come with the newword g4 desktop

Re: xfree86 4.1.0-0pre1v1 for powerpc at X Strike Force repository

2001-06-14 Thread Peter Cordes
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 07:15:02PM -0400, Derek Homeier wrote: > Ah, when I was using it I still used an old 8100 with mechanical > CapsLock ;-) Can you get ADB keyboards with a caps lock that I can set to Control_L, or should I just get a USB PCI card and USB keyboard? -- #define X(x,y) x##y

Re: xfree86 4.1.0-0pre1v1 for powerpc at X Strike Force repository

2001-06-14 Thread Derek Homeier
No, we'll probaby have two keep different keymaps at least for the international keyboards to work properly (no, haven't created a mac-de yet, sorry!). If such keymaps need to be created anyway, that can be done for Linux keycodes rigth away, can't it? Yes, that's what I was talking about, o

Re: xfree86 4.1.0-0pre1v1 for powerpc at X Strike Force repository

2001-06-14 Thread Michel Dänzer
Derek Homeier wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 02:55:25PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 05:11:59PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > > > These packages are better than 4.0.3-x in the sense that they set the > > > model to "macintosh" instead of "pc104", too bad Xkb is br

Re: xfree86 4.1.0-0pre1v1 for powerpc at X Strike Force repository

2001-06-14 Thread Derek Homeier
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 02:55:25PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote: > On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 05:11:59PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > These packages are better than 4.0.3-x in the sense that they set the model > > to > > "macintosh" instead of "pc104", too bad Xkb is broken now... > > > > once w

Re: xfree86 4.1.0-0pre1v1 for powerpc at X Strike Force repository

2001-06-14 Thread Michel Dänzer
Ethan Benson wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 05:52:18PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > Ethan Benson wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 11:45:25PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > > > > > > - Xkb doesn't work with Macintosh keycodes anymore, used to work with > > > > 4.0.3 > > > > >

Re: xfree86 4.1.0-0pre1v1 for powerpc at X Strike Force repository

2001-06-13 Thread Ethan Benson
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 05:11:59PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > These packages are better than 4.0.3-x in the sense that they set the model to > "macintosh" instead of "pc104", too bad Xkb is broken now... > once we switch to linux keycodes that has to be changed back no? -- Ethan Benson http

Re: xfree86 4.1.0-0pre1v1 for powerpc at X Strike Force repository

2001-06-13 Thread Ethan Benson
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 05:52:18PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > Ethan Benson wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 11:45:25PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > > > > - Xkb doesn't work with Macintosh keycodes anymore, used to work with > > > 4.0.3 > > > > another reason we should switch to li

Re: xfree86 4.1.0-0pre1v1 for powerpc at X Strike Force repository

2001-06-13 Thread Michel Dänzer
Ethan Benson wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 11:45:25PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > > - Xkb doesn't work with Macintosh keycodes anymore, used to work with > > 4.0.3 > > another reason we should switch to linux keycodes ASAP. AFAICT all > this involves is changing console-data or one

Re: xfree86 4.1.0-0pre1v1 for powerpc at X Strike Force repository

2001-06-13 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Michel Dänzer wrote: > Branden Robinson wrote: > > 5) What is the canonical way of saying in shell: > >"if using_fbcon; then"? > >(Probably something to do with /proc.) > > /proc/fb contains the list of available framebuffer devices. Beware that > "UseFBDev" doesn't wo

Re: xfree86 4.1.0-0pre1v1 for powerpc at X Strike Force repository

2001-06-13 Thread Michel Dänzer
Branden Robinson wrote: > > - the generated XF86Config locks up the machine on r128 Notebooks. The > > Device Section needs either Option "UseFBDev" (only works with aty128fb) > > or "ProgramFPRegs" "No" to avoid that. > > Okay. This is something I can make dexconf do, but I have a few quest

Re: xfree86 4.1.0-0pre1v1 for powerpc at X Strike Force repository

2001-06-13 Thread Bertrand Sereno
Hi, Works perfectly on my iBook rev1 (Mach64) Anti-aliased fonts rules ! ;) Thanks for these packages, Bertrand.

Re: xfree86 4.1.0-0pre1v1 for powerpc at X Strike Force repository

2001-06-12 Thread Branden Robinson
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 11:45:25PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > And they work for me, with a few caveats: Glad to hear it! > - the generated XF86Config locks up the machine on r128 Notebooks. The Device > Section needs either Option "UseFBDev" (only works with aty128fb) or > "ProgramFPRegs"

Re: xfree86 4.1.0-0pre1v1 for powerpc at X Strike Force repository

2001-06-12 Thread Ethan Benson
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 11:45:25PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > - Xkb doesn't work with Macintosh keycodes anymore, used to work with 4.0.3 > another reason we should switch to linux keycodes ASAP. AFAICT all this involves is changing console-data or one of those.. should i file an importa

Re: xfree86 4.1.0-0pre1v1 for powerpc at X Strike Force repository

2001-06-12 Thread Michel Dänzer
Branden Robinson wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 12:22:08AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > xfree86 (4.1.0-0pre1v1) unstable; urgency=low > > These packages are now available for powerpc. And they work for me, with a few caveats: - the generated XF86Config locks up the machine on r128 Not

xfree86 4.1.0-0pre1v1 for powerpc at X Strike Force repository

2001-06-12 Thread Branden Robinson
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 12:22:08AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > xfree86 (4.1.0-0pre1v1) unstable; urgency=low These packages are now available for powerpc. -- G. Branden Robinson | If you make people think they're Debian GNU/Linux| thinking, they'll love