On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 08:58:19AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 02:54:51PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 08:46:41AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 02:40:34PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I never said it needed
On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 02:54:51PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 08:46:41AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 02:40:34PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I never said it needed to be rejected, I just said add #if's around it,
> > > > which was
>
On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 08:46:41AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 02:40:34PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > >
> > > I never said it needed to be rejected, I just said add #if's around it,
> > > which was
> > > contructive and solved both problems. You cannot have it in regmach
On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 02:40:34PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> >
> > I never said it needed to be rejected, I just said add #if's around it,
> > which was
> > contructive and solved both problems. You cannot have it in regmach64.h
> > even with
> > the #if's around it for sparc, I tried it and i
On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 08:30:37AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 02:17:43PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > >
> > > As I said before commenting that out will break sparc, please add "#ifdef
> > > __sparc__" around the function instead.
> >
> > Huh ???
> >
> > Ok, but it makes
On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 02:17:43PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> >
> > As I said before commenting that out will break sparc, please add "#ifdef
> > __sparc__" around the function instead.
>
> Huh ???
>
> Ok, but it makes no sense to have regwbe for sparc in mach64im.c, and having
> regw,regr and
On Wed, Sep 22, 1999 at 04:04:41AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 1999 at 03:23:10PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 07:53:00PM +0200, Hartmut Koptein wrote:
> > > > > And another mistake in the patch, should have waited a bit more
> > > > > before posting,
> > >
On Wed, Sep 22, 1999 at 03:23:10PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 07:53:00PM +0200, Hartmut Koptein wrote:
> > > > And another mistake in the patch, should have waited a bit more before
> > > > posting,
> > > > but since i was going away, i wanted to make things available.
> >
On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 07:53:00PM +0200, Hartmut Koptein wrote:
> > > And another mistake in the patch, should have waited a bit more before
> > > posting,
> > > but since i was going away, i wanted to make things available.
> > >
> > > Anyway, the build process breaks again læter, didn't have t
On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 03:14:46PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 05:04:58AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > Could you try the 3.3.5 source that was installed yesterday? It built fine
> > on sparc (which 3.3.4-2 didn't do).
>
> Ok, i will download the source, and build it this e
> > And another mistake in the patch, should have waited a bit more before
> > posting,
> > but since i was going away, i wanted to make things available.
> >
> > Anyway, the build process breaks again læter, didn't have time to check it
> > out
> > though.
> >
> > So the correct patch for the
On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 05:04:58AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 03:01:43PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 02:14:30PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 09:24:17AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Oops a little
On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 03:01:43PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 02:14:30PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 09:24:17AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > >
> >
> >
> > Oops a little mistake came up because of the haste, correct patch is
> > attached
> > ..
On Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 02:14:30PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 09:24:17AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> >
>
>
> Oops a little mistake came up because of the haste, correct patch is attached
> ...
And another mistake in the patch, should have waited a bit more before postin
On Thu, 16 Sep 1999, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 05:12:39AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 02:14:30PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > > ---
> > > /home/luther/Xfree/3.3/debian/xfree86-1-3.3.4/build-tree/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/accel/mach64/mach64util.c.
On Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 05:12:39AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 02:14:30PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > ---
> > /home/luther/Xfree/3.3/debian/xfree86-1-3.3.4/build-tree/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/accel/mach64/mach64util.c.orig
> > Thu Sep 16 07:34:58 1999
> > +++
>
On Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 02:11:49PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Sep 1999, Sven LUTHER wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 09:24:17AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > Oops a little mistake came up because of the haste, correct patch is
> > attached
> Just a quick question, for bu
On Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 04:29:06AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 09:24:17AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > --- xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree68/mach64/Imakefile.origWed Sep 15
> > 18:24:42 1999
> > +++ xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree68/mach64/Imakefile Wed Sep 15 18:25:04 1999
On Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 02:14:30PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> ---
> /home/luther/Xfree/3.3/debian/xfree86-1-3.3.4/build-tree/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/accel/mach64/mach64util.c.orig
> Thu Sep 16 07:34:58 1999
> +++
> /home/luther/Xfree/3.3/debian/xfree86-1-3.3.4/build-tree/xc/programs
On Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 09:24:17AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> --- xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree68/mach64/Imakefile.orig Wed Sep 15
> 18:24:42 1999
> +++ xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree68/mach64/Imakefile Wed Sep 15 18:25:04 1999
> @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
> LinkSourceFile(mach64pntwn.c,../../xfree86
On Thu, 16 Sep 1999, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 09:24:17AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> Oops a little mistake came up because of the haste, correct patch is attached
Just a quick question, for building xfree on m68k I had to remove mach64,
imstt and pm2 from some Imakefile, since
On Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 09:24:17AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
>
Oops a little mistake came up because of the haste, correct patch is attached
...
> Friendly,
>
> Sven LUTHER
--- xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/accel/mach64/mach64im.c.orig Wed Sep 15
17:01:53 1999
+++ xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfr
Hello,
I fixed the mach64 build problem on fbdev and powerpc, i just had time to fix
it this morning before going to work, but was not able to build the full debian
packages. I will be away until monday, so if someone want to apply this patch
and rebuild the packages, go ahead.
There was a proble
23 matches
Mail list logo
