Re: xfree86-1 3.3.6-3; 3 down, 3 to go

2000-01-28 Thread Sven LUTHER
On Thu, Jan 27, 2000 at 09:11:57AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 27, 2000 at 11:01:52AM +0100, Sven LUTHER wrote: > > Any news on 3.9.x servers ? > > Please read www.debian.org/~branden. Also, within the past 2 days I posted > my plans for 3.9.x to this list. Haven't you been read

Re: xfree86-1 3.3.6-3; 3 down, 3 to go

2000-01-27 Thread Branden Robinson
On Thu, Jan 27, 2000 at 11:56:37AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > i got a message from someone telling me about this two patches. Apparently > > kbdrate.patch is needed on some macs since the kbdrate changes in Xfree. I > > have no macs, and lost my mail archive, so i don't know if this is st

Re: xfree86-1 3.3.6-3; 3 down, 3 to go

2000-01-27 Thread Branden Robinson
On Thu, Jan 27, 2000 at 11:01:52AM +0100, Sven LUTHER wrote: > Any news on 3.9.x servers ? Please read www.debian.org/~branden. Also, within the past 2 days I posted my plans for 3.9.x to this list. Haven't you been reading it? > i think it would be nice to have at least a server package, since

Re: xfree86-1 3.3.6-3; 3 down, 3 to go

2000-01-27 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Thu, Jan 27, 2000, Geert Uytterhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The second patch fbdev-dpms.patch contains a patch to have dpms aware fbdev >> Xserver. Since i cannot compile, i couldn't test it. > >I never tried that patch, but it's needed to make use of the power save ioctl >in frame buff

Re: xfree86-1 3.3.6-3; 3 down, 3 to go

2000-01-27 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Thu, 27 Jan 2000, Sven LUTHER wrote: > On Wed, Jan 26, 2000 at 02:29:30PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 26, 2000 at 04:44:36PM +0100, Sven LUTHER wrote: > > > Ok thanks, ... > > > > > > i managed to build it in ~600MBs, being root and all so it will use the > > > extra > > > s

Re: xfree86-1 3.3.6-3; 3 down, 3 to go

2000-01-27 Thread Sven LUTHER
On Wed, Jan 26, 2000 at 02:29:30PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Wed, Jan 26, 2000 at 04:44:36PM +0100, Sven LUTHER wrote: > > Ok thanks, ... > > > > i managed to build it in ~600MBs, being root and all so it will use the > > extra > > space also, and removing stuff as it goes, specially th

Re: xfree86-1 3.3.6-3; 3 down, 3 to go

2000-01-26 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Jan 26, 2000 at 04:44:36PM +0100, Sven LUTHER wrote: > Ok thanks, ... > > i managed to build it in ~600MBs, being root and all so it will use the extra > space also, and removing stuff as it goes, specially the upstream source. But > it never passed the build stage even so. > > Does the p

Re: xfree86-1 3.3.6-3; 3 down, 3 to go

2000-01-26 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Jan 26, 2000 at 02:30:51PM +0100, Sven LUTHER wrote: > i will not be able to build xfree this time, as i lack disk space for it. Btw, > branden, is there any particular reason why 570MB are not enough for it, while > 300Mb are ok for building the upstream X server ? The -g option to gcc mi

Re: xfree86-1 3.3.6-3; 3 down, 3 to go

2000-01-26 Thread Sven LUTHER
On Wed, Jan 26, 2000 at 10:37:38AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Wed, Jan 26, 2000 at 02:30:51PM +0100, Sven LUTHER wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 25, 2000 at 11:21:28PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > [Sorry for the wide crossposting.] > > > > > > xfree86-1 3.3.6-3 was installed into the arch

Re: xfree86-1 3.3.6-3; 3 down, 3 to go

2000-01-26 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Wed, Jan 26, 2000 at 02:30:51PM +0100, Sven LUTHER wrote: > On Tue, Jan 25, 2000 at 11:21:28PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > [Sorry for the wide crossposting.] > > > > xfree86-1 3.3.6-3 was installed into the archive for alpha and i386 > > yesterday. > > > > The sparc packages are in Inco

Re: xfree86-1 3.3.6-3; 3 down, 3 to go

2000-01-26 Thread Sven LUTHER
On Tue, Jan 25, 2000 at 11:21:28PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > [Sorry for the wide crossposting.] > > xfree86-1 3.3.6-3 was installed into the archive for alpha and i386 > yesterday. > > The sparc packages are in Incoming. > > That leaves arm, m68k, and powerpc, which I traditionally do not

Re: xfree86-1 3.3.6-3; 3 down, 3 to go

2000-01-26 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Tue, Jan 25, 2000 at 11:21:28PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > [Sorry for the wide crossposting.] > > xfree86-1 3.3.6-3 was installed into the archive for alpha and i386 > yesterday. > > The sparc packages are in Incoming. > > That leaves arm, m68k, and powerpc, which I traditionally do not

xfree86-1 3.3.6-3; 3 down, 3 to go

2000-01-26 Thread Branden Robinson
[Sorry for the wide crossposting.] xfree86-1 3.3.6-3 was installed into the archive for alpha and i386 yesterday. The sparc packages are in Incoming. That leaves arm, m68k, and powerpc, which I traditionally do not build myself. This is just a message to let folks know that it's ready for build