Re: swsusp and cpufreq

2004-11-03 Thread Michael Schmitz
> BTW, I've seen an experimental CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND kernel option, > anybody have try it? Does it make possible to not unload usb modules? Didn't work last time I tried. Michael

Re: swsusp and cpufreq

2004-11-03 Thread Djoume SALVETTI
Le mercredi 11/03/04 Guido Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > You still have the ohci_hcd module loaded or compiled in, remove that. Oh yes you're right, it was compiled in it's why I've forgot it... BTW, I've seen an experimental CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND kernel option, anybody have try it? Does

Re: swsusp and cpufreq

2004-11-03 Thread Guido Guenther
On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 09:08:27PM +0100, Djoumé SALVETTI wrote: > Le lundi 11/01/04 Djoumé SALVETTI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > > > > Is there any compatibility problem between your swsusp patch and > > > > cpufreq? I have experience some resume failure (most of the resume work, > > > > but so

Re: swsusp and cpufreq

2004-11-02 Thread Djoumé SALVETTI
Le lundi 11/01/04 Djoumé SALVETTI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > > > Is there any compatibility problem between your swsusp patch and > > > cpufreq? I have experience some resume failure (most of the resume work, > > > but sometime, they fail without any visible reason) with 2.6.9 patch > > > with

Re: swsusp and cpufreq

2004-11-01 Thread Djoumé SALVETTI
Le lundi 11/01/04 Guido Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > > (I don't know where to file a bug, if you know a better place where to > > send this message please tell me). > [EMAIL PROTECTED], please add it to the cc: list for further > replies. Ok. (I think you mean [EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > I