> I was concerned about the keys that differ on an Apple keyboard,
> compared to a PC keyboard. Like control, option, apple, vs. control,
> windows, alt, altgt and the other 2 keys. Maybe these can be redefined
> after including the main rules/xfree86 file.
Yes, they can. The number of keys that
On Tue, Aug 26, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On Monday 25 August 2003 8:59, Olaf Hering wrote:
> > The non us and de maps need review, but should almost match what MacOS
> > does.
>
> So I looked at the extensive diffs you sent, and I have a couple of
> questions.
> The first is about the changes you
On Monday 25 August 2003 8:59, Olaf Hering wrote:
> The non us and de maps need review, but should almost match what MacOS
> does.
So I looked at the extensive diffs you sent, and I have a couple of questions.
The first is about the changes you made to the macintosh keycodes file. I
like the new
On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 22:44, Frank Murphy wrote:
>
> My point for having an apple file is that I'd like the macintosh symbol maps
> to be based on the default symbols. That way, when changes like the
> ISO_Shift_Level/Mode_switch and alt_is_meta happen, the Apple keyboards stay
> current.
And
On Monday 25 August 2003 2:55, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> (How) does this work with layouts other than us? And how do you get
> laptop with nodeadkeys?
It doesn't. Sorry about that. I went to quickly and was seduced by the idea of
the variant. :) I've attached a patch that does it more like you had,
On Mon, Aug 25, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 11:06, Frank Murphy wrote:
> >
> > --- rules/xfree86.dpkg-dist 2003-02-26 09:39:56.0 +0100
> > +++ rules/xfree86 2003-08-24 11:54:28.0 +0200
> > @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@
> >pc105nodeadkeys =
On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 11:06, Frank Murphy wrote:
>
> --- rules/xfree86.dpkg-dist 2003-02-26 09:39:56.0 +0100
> +++ rules/xfree86 2003-08-24 11:54:28.0 +0200
> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@
>pc105nodeadkeys = en_US(pc105%_v)+%l%(v)
>microsoftnode
On Monday 25 August 2003 9:57, Andreas Wüst wrote:
> But hey, thank you very much!! I've now lost a bit track, testing all
> the new laptop keymap versions and its patches. But from my point of
> view, this seems to lead to the right solution.
I've attached a patch here that should apply to the De
Hi Frank
On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 15:27, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 August 2003 12:52, Andreas Wüst wrote:
> > On Sat, 2003-08-16 at 19:19, Frank Murphy wrote:
> > > On Saturday 16 August 2003 1:23, Andreas Wüst wrote:
> > > > Well, it kind of worked. I could reach the third group via fn+al
On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 15:23, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On Thursday 21 August 2003 12:40, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 11:44, Frank Murphy wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 20 August 2003 5:33, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > > I can get the fourth level with Mode_switch-Shift-key (as opposed to
>
On Tuesday 19 August 2003 12:52, Andreas Wüst wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-08-16 at 19:19, Frank Murphy wrote:
> > On Saturday 16 August 2003 1:23, Andreas Wüst wrote:
> > > Well, it kind of worked. I could reach the third group via fn+alt (the
> > > left one, I don't remember the right one), but, hmm, no
On Thursday 21 August 2003 12:40, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 11:44, Frank Murphy wrote:
> > On Wednesday 20 August 2003 5:33, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > I can get the fourth level with Mode_switch-Shift-key (as opposed to
> > > Shift-Mode_switch-key, which becomes Multi_key-key),
On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 11:44, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 August 2003 5:33, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > I can get the fourth level with Mode_switch-Shift-key (as opposed to
> > Shift-Mode_switch-key, which becomes Multi_key-key),
>
> OK, I got it. It's a bit wierd to get to Mutli_key, but i
On Wednesday 20 August 2003 5:33, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> I can get the fourth level with Mode_switch-Shift-key (as opposed to
> Shift-Mode_switch-key, which becomes Multi_key-key),
OK, I got it. It's a bit wierd to get to Mutli_key, but it works OK as a
default. I'll probably add another variati
On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 13:31, Frank Murphy wrote:
>
> The problem is that Mode_switch and Multi_key can't be assigned to the same
> keycode or keysym with only a level-shift to separate them. The third- and
> fourth-levels are useless because Mode_switch must be pressed before they can
> be used
On Wednesday 20 August 2003 11:17, Emmanuel Eckard wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 August 2003 11:07, David M. Cooke wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 10:33:17PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 22:22, Frank Murphy wrote:
> > > > It seems that we need a new key for Multi_key as wel
On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 11:07, David M. Cooke wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 10:33:17PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 22:22, Frank Murphy wrote:
> > >
> > > It seems that we need a new key for Multi_key as well. Any ideas?
> >
> > I proposed earlier what I've been using fo
On Wednesday 20 August 2003 11:07, David M. Cooke wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 10:33:17PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 22:22, Frank Murphy wrote:
> > > It seems that we need a new key for Multi_key as well. Any ideas?
> >
> > I proposed earlier what I've been using for
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 10:33:17PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 22:22, Frank Murphy wrote:
> >
> > It seems that we need a new key for Multi_key as well. Any ideas?
>
> I proposed earlier what I've been using for a while:
>
> 108 0xff7e (Mode_switch)0xff20
On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 22:22, Frank Murphy wrote:
>
> It seems that we need a new key for Multi_key as well. Any ideas?
I proposed earlier what I've been using for a while:
108 0xff7e (Mode_switch)0xff20 (Multi_key)
Or does anybody _really_ need that stupid enter key? :)
--
Ea
On Tuesday 19 August 2003 1:32, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 00:52, Andreas Wüst wrote:
> > fn+alt+6:
> >
> > KeyPress event, serial 28, synthetic NO, window 0x181,
> > root 0x2d, subw 0x182, time 386835101, (53,50), root:(539,353),
> > state 0x0, keycode 113 (keysym
On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 00:52, Andreas Wüst wrote:
>
> fn+alt+6:
>
> KeyPress event, serial 28, synthetic NO, window 0x181,
> root 0x2d, subw 0x182, time 386835101, (53,50), root:(539,353),
> state 0x0, keycode 113 (keysym 0xff7e, Mode_switch), same_screen
> YES,
> XLookupString
Hi Frank
On Sat, 2003-08-16 at 19:19, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On Saturday 16 August 2003 1:23, Andreas Wüst wrote:
> > Well, it kind of worked. I could reach the third group via fn+alt (the
> > left one, I don't remember the right one), but, hmm, not all symbols
> > worked. For example, I could get
23 matches
Mail list logo
