Re: slang1 (<< 1.3) weirdness

1999-12-09 Thread Sven LUTHER
On Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 09:09:19AM +0100, Manuel Sickert wrote: > Hi, > > yesterday I had the same problems while upgrading gimp. > I just forced dpkg to install gimp(1.0.4-2) with the latest slang1 > library (1.3.9-1). Up to now it works fine for me. Men, I don't won't > to mess up your systems!

Re: slang1 (<< 1.3) weirdness

1999-12-07 Thread C.M. Connelly
Nathan, > "NO" == Nathan Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: NO> Um, a bug report? Let's keep this in perspective. Potato NO> is the *unstable* Debian tree (use at your own risk, NO> etc.). From what I can tell, the volunteers on the PowerPC NO> team are doing a phenomenal job.

Re: slang1 (<< 1.3) weirdness

1999-12-07 Thread Manuel Sickert
Hi, yesterday I had the same problems while upgrading gimp. I just forced dpkg to install gimp(1.0.4-2) with the latest slang1 library (1.3.9-1). Up to now it works fine for me. Men, I don't won't to mess up your systems! I just told it worked for me ;-) Manuel PS: IMHO the "<" should be a ">".

Re: slang1 (<< 1.3) weirdness

1999-12-07 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Mon, Dec 06, 1999 at 09:43:58PM -0800, Nathan Olsen wrote: > Um, a bug report? Let's keep this in perspective. Potato is the *unstable* > Debian tree (use at your own risk, etc.). From what I can tell, the > volunteers on the PowerPC team are doing a phenomenal job. Well, -someone- has to repo

Re: slang1 (<< 1.3) weirdness

1999-12-07 Thread Nathan Olsen
>> "MS" == Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >MS> I realize this is an old version of slang1. I upgraded to >MS> 1.3.9 just now and get the same dependency problem (though I >MS> expected it this time). Which leads to the next >MS> question... how do I resolve this

[jim@ic.uva.nl: Re: slang1 (<< 1.3) weirdness]

1999-12-07 Thread Michael G Schwern
G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: slang1 (<< 1.3) weirdness Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.1i In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g

Re: slang1 (<< 1.3) weirdness

1999-12-06 Thread C.M. Connelly
> "MS" == Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: MS> This is an odd dependency problem I've been seeing lately from MS> slang1: MS> lynx-ssl depends on slang1 (<< 1.3) bb depends on slang1 (<< MS> 1.3) libggi-target-aa depends on slang1 (<< 1.3) urlview MS> depends

Re: slang1 (<< 1.3) weirdness

1999-12-06 Thread Kevin Puetz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > Oh dear, I'm an idiot. I just realized that dselect was warning me > -not- to upgrade slang because of the dependency problem with > upgrading. Still, will I have to perpetually hold slang1 back? > On Mon, Dec 06, 1999 at 05:09:31PM -0500, Michael G Schwern wrote: Di

Re: slang1 (<< 1.3) weirdness

1999-12-06 Thread Michael G Schwern
Oh dear, I'm an idiot. I just realized that dselect was warning me -not- to upgrade slang because of the dependency problem with upgrading. Still, will I have to perpetually hold slang1 back? On Mon, Dec 06, 1999 at 05:09:31PM -0500, Michael G Schwern wrote: > This is an odd dependency problem

slang1 (<< 1.3) weirdness

1999-12-06 Thread Michael G Schwern
This is an odd dependency problem I've been seeing lately from slang1: lynx-ssl depends on slang1 (<< 1.3) bb depends on slang1 (<< 1.3) libggi-target-aa depends on slang1 (<< 1.3) urlview depends on slang1 (<< 1.3) gimp depends on slang1 (<< 1.3) dselect reports this as a dependency conflict eve