On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 09:56:49AM +0900, Joongul Lee wrote:
> I was told that it is more secure to have
>
> export XAUTHORITY=$HOME/.Xauthority
>
> executed in one of the initialization scripts (I have it in ~/.bashrc)
Yes, because that stops other users on the same machine from getting in.
I
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 12:16:56AM -0800, Alan DuBoff wrote:
> Mike Fedyk wrote:
>
> > You can use the "xhost" command and enable access from the entire localhost.
>
> Yep, that is what I used to do on XFree86 3.3.x, and specifically I would
> issue:
> xhost +localhost
>
oh, I didn't know that w
I was told that it is more secure to have
export XAUTHORITY=$HOME/.Xauthority
executed in one of the initialization scripts (I have it in ~/.bashrc)
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 12:16:56AM -0800, Alan DuBoff wrote:
> Mike Fedyk wrote:
>
> > You can use the "xhost" command and enable access from th
Mike Fedyk wrote:
> You can use the "xhost" command and enable access from the entire localhost.
Yep, that is what I used to do on XFree86 3.3.x, and specifically I would
issue:
xhost +localhost
Ah, I just figured it out...
xhost +local:username
does the trick...I guess XFree86 will only allo
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 11:32:52PM -0800, Alan DuBoff wrote:
> Alan DuBoff wrote:
>
> > I remember a friend mentioning that XFree86 requires something be put in
> > .Xauthority, but I wasn't sure what it was.
>
> Ooops, that should be "XFree86 4.x requires...".
>
You can use the "xhost" command
Alan DuBoff wrote:
> I remember a friend mentioning that XFree86 requires something be put in
> .Xauthority, but I wasn't sure what it was.
Ooops, that should be "XFree86 4.x requires...".
--
Alan DuBoff
Software Orchestration, Inc.
In XFree86 3.3.x, it was possible to allow the localhost to be able to use the
X server so that you could allow the localhost access, change users and run as
that user.
I remember a friend mentioning that XFree86 requires something be put in
.Xauthority, but I wasn't sure what it was.
Can some ki
7 matches
Mail list logo