Hi Michael,
On Wed, 2024-03-06 at 12:57 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > Yep, the second, older image works as expected. However, the recent one
> > does not
> > and I have absolutely no clue why.
>
> I actually tested both, and both work, but then I cited the wrong one in
> my email >_<
>
>
Hi,
On Wed, 2024-03-06 at 12:57 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > p, the second, older image works as expected. However, the recent one does
> > not
> > and I have absolutely no clue why.
>
> I actually tested both, and both work, but then I cited the wrong one in
> my email >_<
>
> So at leas
Hi Michael,
On Wed, 2024-03-06 at 12:57 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > Yep, the second, older image works as expected. However, the recent one
> > does not
> > and I have absolutely no clue why.
>
> I actually tested both, and both work, but then I cited the wrong one in
> my email >_<
>
>
Hello JPA Glaubitz,
first of all thank you forr dedicated work dealing with the problems of loading
Debian 12 onto the old Mac G5 Power PC machine infrastructure.
I recently tried to install your latest iso debian-12.0.0-ppc64-NETINST-1.iso
onto my Dual 1.8GhZ G5 Power PC. After burning the is
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz writes:
> On Fri, 2024-03-01 at 12:56 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> That second iso boots OK for me in qemu. It boots grub and then the
>> kernel loads and shows:
>>
>> Loading ...
>> OF stdout device is: /pci@f000/mac-io@c/escc@13000/ch-a@13020
>> Preparin
On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 03:47:26PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> The problem is that the newer image doesn't boot and currently I don't know
> why because installing the exact same kernel later from the package manager
> into an installed system works yields a bootable system with the l
Hi Michael,
On Fri, 2024-03-01 at 12:56 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> OK.
>
> That second iso boots OK for me in qemu. It boots grub and then the
> kernel loads and shows:
>
> Loading ...
> OF stdout device is: /pci@f000/mac-io@c/escc@13000/ch-a@13020
> Preparing to boot Linux versi
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz writes:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Thu, 2024-02-29 at 17:42 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> > There seems to be a regression in the kernel which affects PowerPC 970
>> > machines,
>> > i.e. PowerMac G5 CPUs. The issue needs to be bisected and reported
>> > upstream.
>>
>>
Hi Michael,
On Thu, 2024-02-29 at 17:42 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > There seems to be a regression in the kernel which affects PowerPC 970
> > machines,
> > i.e. PowerMac G5 CPUs. The issue needs to be bisected and reported upstream.
>
> I have a quad G5 that is booting mainline happily.
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz writes:
> On Tue, 2024-02-20 at 04:16 +0100, tuxayo wrote:
>> I tried snapshots/2024-01-31/debian-12.0.0-ppc64-NETINST-1.iso
>>
>> And was able to start booting from usb with:
>> boot usb0/disk@1:,\boot\grub\powerpc.elf
>> (typed in Open Firmware shell)
>> (usb0 is the t
On 24-02-23 17:35, goberghen wrote:
I'm not sure you'll be able to install debian with that cd image.
I tried about a week ago on my iMac G5 iSight (ati x600 graphics) model,
had to use 2023-05-16 image with kernel options
"radeon.agpmode=1 radeon.modeset=1 video=offb:off nomodeset"
in grub.
Ok
On 24-02-20 10:16, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
There seems to be a regression in the kernel which affects PowerPC 970 machines,
i.e. PowerMac G5 CPUs. The issue needs to be bisected and reported upstream.
If you have the time, I would really appreciate if you could test the various
snapshot
Hello,
On Tue, 2024-02-20 at 04:16 +0100, tuxayo wrote:
> I tried snapshots/2024-01-31/debian-12.0.0-ppc64-NETINST-1.iso
>
> And was able to start booting from usb with:
> boot usb0/disk@1:,\boot\grub\powerpc.elf
> (typed in Open Firmware shell)
> (usb0 is the top port)
>
> Grub worked, and then
Hi again :)
I tried snapshots/2024-01-31/debian-12.0.0-ppc64-NETINST-1.iso
And was able to start booting from usb with:
boot usb0/disk@1:,\boot\grub\powerpc.elf
(typed in Open Firmware shell)
(usb0 is the top port)
Grub worked, and then I tried default install (the 1st option) and it
started l
Thank you very much, it works well now.
Regards,
Kristoffer
--
Wysłane za pomocą Tutanota, bezpiecznej i wolnej od reklam skrzynki pocztowej.
i got the +b1 version of systemd this afternoon and its fixed
On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 10:15 AM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <
glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On 2/2/22 18:55, H wrote:
> > Thank you Adrian!
>
> Try upgrading your machines, it should be fixed now.
>
> Adrian
>
> --
>
Hello!
On 2/2/22 18:55, H wrote:
> Thank you Adrian!
Try upgrading your machines, it should be fixed now.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956
Thank you Adrian!
On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 1:00 AM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <
glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On 2/2/22 00:11, H wrote:
> > FWIW, A little bit information that might be helpful:
> >
> > I started journald manually via /lib/systemd/systemd-journald, no error
> mess
Hello!
On 2/2/22 00:11, H wrote:
> FWIW, A little bit information that might be helpful:
>
> I started journald manually via /lib/systemd/systemd-journald, no error
> message
> to stdout and stderr, nor journalctl output. Actually journalctl still does
> not
> work (empty for all services).
>
>
Hello!
On 2/1/22 23:59, Cameron MacPherson wrote:
> on my system i get
> systemd[1]: Caught , core dump failed (child 210, code=killed,
> status=6/ABRT)
>
> prior to rebooting there were messages about journald not starting. i will
> see if
> i can go back to an older version of systemd.
That
Thanks!
Switching apt source to
http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian-ports/20220119T020551Z/ saved me.
On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 4:15 PM Cameron MacPherson <
cameron.macpher...@gmail.com> wrote:
> i got the ppc64 version 250.3-1 of libnss-systemd libpam-systemd
> libsystemd0 systemd-timesync an
i got the ppc64 version 250.3-1 of libnss-systemd libpam-systemd
libsystemd0 systemd-timesync and systemd from snapshot.debian.org and
installed them with dpkg -i and the system boots again
after apt upgrade to 250.3-2 on reboot the machine halts before it restarts
systemd[1]: Caught , dumped core
Hi John,
FWIW, A little bit information that might be helpful:
I started journald manually via /lib/systemd/systemd-journald, no error
message to stdout and stderr, nor journalctl output. Actually journalctl
still does not work (empty for all services).
But the journald seemed started logging to
hi,
on my system i get
systemd[1]: Caught , core dump failed (child 210, code=killed,
status=6/ABRT)
prior to rebooting there were messages about journald not starting. i will
see if i can go back to an older version of systemd.
On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 2:33 PM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <
glaub..
On 2/1/22 23:11, H wrote:
> Namely, systemd-journald and systemd-logind and some other less important
> stuff. And, due to the fact that systemd-journald is unable to start,
> journalctl -xn $service is empty for any services.
It's a bit difficult to say what's wrong without any error messages. Th
Namely, systemd-journald and systemd-logind and some other less important
stuff.
And, due to the fact that systemd-journald is unable to start, journalctl
-xn $service is empty for any services.
On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 2:09 PM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <
glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
> Hell
Hello!
On 2/1/22 22:47, H wrote:
> If you apt update && apt upgrade, or worse, try to install debian with a
> NETINST
> image, by default you will be left in a broken system, complaining about some
> systemd service being unable to start. To make it worse, systemd-journald is
> one
> of the comp
If you apt update && apt upgrade, or worse, try to install debian with a
NETINST image, by default you will be left in a broken system, complaining
about some systemd service being unable to start. To make it worse,
systemd-journald is one of the components that is broken so it is a
struggle to get
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 11:13:15AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Dear developers,
>
> I am using the ppc64 port with multiarch on a powerpc system
> Unfortunately since the general binNMU of ppc64, it does not
> work anymore for Multi-Arch: same packages.
Unfortunately bi
Dear developers,
I am using the ppc64 port with multiarch on a powerpc system
Unfortunately since the general binNMU of ppc64, it does not
work anymore for Multi-Arch: same packages.
For example:
% apt-get install libgmp10:ppc64 libgmp10:powerpc
The following packages have unmet dependencies
hi guys im building all software and library with this flags on my cyrus+
> mcpu=e5500 -mno-altivec -mtune=e5500
and can say im facing little increasing of performance here.
been build :
mesa 11.3 dev with llvm 38
lib sdl2
qemu
host ubuntu mate 16.04
tested qemu-system-i386 with sdl2 Aros guest an
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 07:59:50AM +0900, Hiroyuki Yamamoto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> wbon...@theitmakers.com wrote:
> > The current target is e5500, which means i rebuild packages with the
> > following additionnal flags : -mcpu=e5500 -mno-altivec -mtune=e5500
> >
> > Is there some more generic flags i c
Hi,
wbon...@theitmakers.com wrote:
> The current target is e5500, which means i rebuild packages with the
> following additionnal flags : -mcpu=e5500 -mno-altivec -mtune=e5500
>
> Is there some more generic flags i could use ?
According to binutils, opcodes of e5500 is added to ones of Book E, a
On Mar 31, 2016, at 8:34 AM, Lennart Sorensen
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 01:18:53AM -0700, Rick Thomas wrote:
>> The altivec instructions and other optimizations speed-up significantly
>> certain kinds of programs on CPUs that can use them. It would be a shame to
>> loose the optimized
Hi,
> That's actually a good question. I am guessing you could contact the
> DSA team directly:
>
> https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/resources.html#server-machines
>
> You still have the option to maintain this machine by yourself
> (non-DSA machines are just fine: https://d
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 01:18:53AM -0700, Rick Thomas wrote:
> The altivec instructions and other optimizations speed-up significantly
> certain kinds of programs on CPUs that can use them. It would be a shame to
> loose the optimized versions by dropping back to the lowest common
> denominator
On Mar 30, 2016, at 10:13 AM, wbon...@theitmakers.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le 30.03.2016 17:09, Breno Leitao a écrit :
>> Hi Mathieu,
>> On 03/30/2016 05:40 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
So i would like to know what is the target, and if it is
possible to consider supporting the "most gener
already given binNMU command for only ppc64 port to wanna-build
>> DB at the last Friday,
>> but there are many many source packages, that command takes long long
>> time.
>> Wait a moment.
>
>
> We are currently rebuilding, on our side, the packages needed for the
&g
Hi Hiroyuki,
Thanks for your answer (and for all answers that followed). These are
very good news for me.
So, I'm planning that almost all ppc64 binary packages will be rebuilt
as binNMU.
I have already given binNMU command for only ppc64 port to wanna-build
DB at the last Friday,
but
Hi,
On 03/30/2016 02:13 PM, wbon...@theitmakers.com wrote:
>> Do you mean setting "-mno-altivec" as a generic compiler flag for ppc64?
>
> Yes, that's what i mean. "-mno-altivec" and maybe some other "-mno-something"
> flags, so it could run on any PPC64 cpu, even if it does not have
> altivec/v
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 07:13:49PM +0200, wbon...@theitmakers.com wrote:
> Yes, that's what i mean. "-mno-altivec" and maybe some other
> "-mno-something" flags, so it could run on any PPC64 cpu, even if it does
> not have altivec/vmx, or if it does not have the optional opcodes of the
> PPC64 stan
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 12:06:36PM -0300, Breno Leitao wrote:
> I am wondering if you cannot try to mimic this non-VMX CPU on QEMU using
> -cpu.
>
> Running "$ qemu-system-ppc -cpu help" shows a lot of CPUs that are supported
> in
> QEMU. I am still not sure if we can exploit KVM if we use a di
Hi,
Le 30.03.2016 17:09, Breno Leitao a écrit :
Hi Mathieu,
On 03/30/2016 05:40 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
So i would like to know what is the target, and if it is
possible to consider supporting the "most generic PPC64 target", just
like it is done for x86 archs ?
Do you mean setting "-mn
the best is without altivec at all.
here on P5020 many programs icewasell too crash because altivec
luigi
Inviato da iPad
> Il giorno 30 mar 2016, alle ore 17:27, Breno Leitao ha
> scritto:
>
> Hi Mathieu,
>
> On 03/30/2016 05:40 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>>> So i would like to know what
Hi Mathieu,
On 03/30/2016 05:40 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> So i would like to know what is the target, and if it is
>> possible to consider supporting the "most generic PPC64 target", just
>> like it is done for x86 archs ?
Do you mean setting "-mno-altivec" as a generic compiler flag for pp
Hi Lennart,
On 03/30/2016 11:30 AM, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> Certainly. And getting access to one of the ones that causes trouble
> by not having VMX seems even harder in fact.
I am wondering if you cannot try to mimic this non-VMX CPU on QEMU using -cpu.
Running "$ qemu-system-ppc -cpu help"
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 04:41:40PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Lennart Sorensen
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 04:26:59PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> >> Let me rephrase that in: "Wow somebody (user)tagged specifically with
> >> ppc64 the nouveau b
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Lennart Sorensen
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 04:26:59PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> Let me rephrase that in: "Wow somebody (user)tagged specifically with
>> ppc64 the nouveau bugs" ... :)
>>
>> This was not clear. But the offer to ppc64 machine(s) was m
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 04:26:59PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Let me rephrase that in: "Wow somebody (user)tagged specifically with
> ppc64 the nouveau bugs" ... :)
>
> This was not clear. But the offer to ppc64 machine(s) was made by the
> ppc64el people:
>
> https://lists.debian.org/debi
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Lennart Sorensen
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:40:52AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> Well that's odd. Anyway feel free to report the bug and assign it the
>> usertags to ppc64:
>>
>> https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/bts-usertags.cgi?tag=ppc64&user=debian-p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi, William,
William Bonnet wrote:
> ./ Is there a defined "minimal" target for the PPC64 port ? I have
> understood that VMX support is not enabled [1] (please tell me if i am
> wrong). But VMX is not the only optional fea
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:40:52AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Well that's odd. Anyway feel free to report the bug and assign it the
> usertags to ppc64:
>
> https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/bts-usertags.cgi?tag=ppc64&user=debian-powerpc%40lists.debian.org
Wow, 5 out of 11 bugs are to do with
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 8:54 PM, William Bonnet wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am currently working (office work) on a project using PPC64 based
> boards, each board is running a NXP e5500 processor. We plan to use
> Debian, and thus the PPC64 port. So, I have tested the version from
will be better ;-)
Luigi
> To: debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org
> From: will...@wbonnet.net
> Subject: PPC64 port status
> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 20:54:37 +0200
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am currently working (office work) on a project using PPC64 based
> boards, each b
Hi all,
I am currently working (office work) on a project using PPC64 based
boards, each board is running a NXP e5500 processor. We plan to use
Debian, and thus the PPC64 port. So, I have tested the version from
debian-ports, it is almost working, but it seems that packages have been
compiled
On Mon, 09 Feb 2015 14:27:02 -0200
Breno Leitao wrote:
> Hi Konstantinos,
Hi Breno,
> Thanks for being interested in it. I am also willing to help.
>
> Why not using a remote VM on a new POWER machine hosted at Unicamp?
Already have 2 of those, one ppc64el and one ppc32 (but on ppc64
hardware)
://openpower.ic.unicamp.br/minicloud/
On 02/02/2015 06:22 PM, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 09:44:44PM +0200, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like to help on the ppc64 port, I have ppc32 hardware,
>> ppc64/ppc64el remote VM accounts but no actual p
On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 21:44:44 +0200
Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to help on the ppc64 port, I have ppc32 hardware,
> ppc64/ppc64el remote VM accounts but no actual ppc64 hardware. I
> just lost an extremely low bid for an imac g5 on ebay and am short
&
Hi Konstantinos,
2015-02-03 22:07 UTC+02.00, Konstantinos Margaritis :
>
> If the offer still stands, I will send you a private message to arrange
> this.
>
Yes, it does.
Risto
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
On Tue, 3 Feb 2015 11:59:34 +0200
Risto Suominen wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Risto,
> It's DDR (400). I'm afraid it cannot be expanded over 2 GB.
2GB is fine for what I'm after. And after reading about Xserve fan noise
levels on Google (and hearing it on youtube :), I think I can confirm
that my wife woul
x1.8GHz, GeForce FX 5200, only
>>>> 512MB RAM but a fast 74GB WD Raptor w/ 10000 RPM, a bluetooth module and
>>>> a SuperDrive) but it works fine.
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately it comes in a very large box (60cm x 60cm x 45cm) and it
>>>> weighs a
gt; a SuperDrive) but it works fine.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately it comes in a very large box (60cm x 60cm x 45cm) and it
>>> weighs about 26kg.
>>>
>>> I'm located in Germany, so I figure shipping inside the EU will be
>>> around 100€ to 150€.
&
s in a very large box (60cm x 60cm x 45cm) and it
> >> weighs about 26kg.
> >>
> >> I'm located in Germany, so I figure shipping inside the EU will be
> >> around 100€ to 150€.
> >>
> >> Is this machine of interest to you?
> >>
&g
gt;>
>> Is this machine of interest to you?
>>
>> Best regards, Clemens Dürrschmidt
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 02/02/2015 08:44 PM, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'd like to help on the ppc64 port, I have pp
machine of the
same type that I might have to «recycle» within a couple of year I would be
more than happy to donate it help with the ppc64 port (in particular
head-less/CD-ROM less installation, as you might guess).
The main cost would be transport, if it is not too far/expensive (I'm in
Hi,
2015-02-03 11:38 UTC+02.00, Konstantinos Margaritis :
>
> That would be a nice choice, if it's in a working condition I can
> fix/replace the fans, do you know if the system is DDR/DDR2?
It's DDR (400). I'm afraid it cannot be expanded over 2 GB.
Risto
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-p
On Tue, 03 Feb 2015 01:09:34 +0100
Clemens Dürrschmidt wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Clemens,
> Unfortunately it comes in a very large box (60cm x 60cm x 45cm) and it
> weighs about 26kg.
>
> I'm located in Germany, so I figure shipping inside the EU will be
> around 100€ to 150€.
>
> Is this machine of in
On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 14:10:04 -0700
"Sandeep G.R" wrote:
> We have G5 running with Ubuntu-12.04 in our office but not sure if
> anyone need it for development. In case no one is using we can sell
> it for you. I'm using T4240QDS and T4240RDB from Freescale and its
> very faster compared to G5. I ha
On Tue, 3 Feb 2015 09:29:26 +0200
Risto Suominen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know about an iMac G5 that might be available. It's the original 17"
> model with 1,6 GHz CPU, 2 GB of RAM, 80 GB HD. The fans are often a
> bit noisy, I'm not sure if that's normal.
>
> The postage would be 43 EURO (up to 10 k
mpute
> node»), but since I have a few other machine of the same type that I
> might have to «recycle» within a couple of year I would be more than
> happy to donate it help with the ppc64 port (in particular
> head-less/CD-ROM less installation, as you might guess).
>
> The main
to «recycle» within a couple of year I would be
more than happy to donate it help with the ppc64 port (in particular
head-less/CD-ROM less installation, as you might guess).
The main cost would be transport, if it is not too far/expensive (I'm in Paris
region, France) I could check with my
Hi,
2015-02-02 21:44 UTC+02.00, Konstantinos Margaritis :
>
> I'd like to help on the ppc64 port, I have ppc32 hardware,
> ppc64/ppc64el remote VM accounts but no actual ppc64 hardware. I
> just lost an extremely low bid for an imac g5 on ebay and am short
> on cash for anothe
nside the EU will be
> around 100€ to 150€.
>
> Is this machine of interest to you?
>
> Best regards, Clemens Dürrschmidt
>
>
>
>
> On 02/02/2015 08:44 PM, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'd like to help on the ppc64 port, I have ppc
Hello,
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 03:55:15PM -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> Unfortunately the build servers at work are busy being build servers,
> so can't do too much experimenting on those, other than in chroots.
> One is a p520 and the other a p710. Those are very nice as PPC build
> machines.
I'd like to help on the ppc64 port, I have ppc32 hardware,
> ppc64/ppc64el remote VM accounts but no actual ppc64 hardware. I
> just lost an extremely low bid for an imac g5 on ebay and am short
> on cash for another, but if anyone has a spare G5 (any model, but pref
> imac so that
We have G5 running with Ubuntu-12.04 in our office but not sure if anyone
need it for development. In case no one is using we can sell it for you.
I'm using T4240QDS and T4240RDB from Freescale and its very faster compared
to G5. I have Debian & Ubuntu running on T4 boards if you need any help let
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 10:48:20PM +0200, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> It should be quite faster, and the ppc notebook above will use an e6500,
> but that will have to wait for a while. In the meantime, I would be fine
> with a used iMac G5, I was almost going to get one minutes ago but I
> was
On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 15:22:01 -0500
"Lennart Sorensen" wrote:
> I guess no one is selling IBM pSeries servers used for cheap.
>
> Are any of the freescale eval boards reasonably priced? After all any
> e5500 or e6500 core is PPC64 as well. It seems a T1040 eval board is
> $1250 US for a 1.4GHz qu
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 09:44:44PM +0200, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to help on the ppc64 port, I have ppc32 hardware,
> ppc64/ppc64el remote VM accounts but no actual ppc64 hardware. I
> just lost an extremely low bid for an imac g5 on ebay and am
Hi all,
I'd like to help on the ppc64 port, I have ppc32 hardware,
ppc64/ppc64el remote VM accounts but no actual ppc64 hardware. I
just lost an extremely low bid for an imac g5 on ebay and am short
on cash for another, but if anyone has a spare G5 (any model, but pref
imac so that it can be
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 09:31:59PM +0900, Hiroyuki Yamamoto wrote:
> Hi, All.
> I am a ppc64 porter, Hiroyuki Yamamoto.
>
> Because ppc64 port is NOT a official port yet,
> please DON'T report to official BTS the bugs which have NOT a relation to the
> packages AT
Hi, All.
I am a ppc64 porter, Hiroyuki Yamamoto.
Because ppc64 port is NOT a official port yet,
please DON'T report to official BTS the bugs which have NOT a relation to the
packages AT ALL,
and which have a relation ONLY to porting to ppc64 port,
Instead, please report to this debian-po
cially since you have
way less than 4GB ram. The code size increase from the larger pointers
will probably hurt performance instead.
I believe the ppc64 port has chosen a baseline that requires altivec
which means if you don't have it, stick with plain ppc.
Certainly altivec is a useful feature if
Hi, List,
I'm working to run Debian ppc64 ports on my xbox360 box, but
failed to setup a chrooted environment with "Illegal instruction"
error. After some dig on this problem, I found this is caused
by PowerPC vector instrunctions, and according to the build
log[1], the package do compile with "
(2012-05-08 07:50 -0300), Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> Hi, folks.
Hi,
> I would like to start contributing to the PPC64 port, since I have
> access to some machines.
>
> When trying to debootstrap from debian-ports, I find that the sid
> Packages file has coreut
Hi, folks.
I would like to start contributing to the PPC64 port, since I have
access to some machines.
When trying to debootstrap from debian-ports, I find that the sid
Packages file has coreutils (and maybe all other packages in
unreleased?) missing. unreleased, on the other hand, does not have
25 dec 2011 kl. 15.45 skrev Hiroyuki Yamamoto:
I am planning to restart Debian ppc64 porting.
Now, I finished preparing the packages for buildd.
This sounds great. Keep us posted! Let me know if you need
testpiloting on Dual 2.0 G5.
/MiB
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-req
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
I am planning to restart Debian ppc64 porting.
Now, I finished preparing the packages for buildd.
deb http://yamamoto.fam.cx/debian unreleased main
So, I would like to apply for using debian-ports infrastructure for ppc64 port.
I will open
Hi,
I am planning to restart Debian ppc64 porting.
Now, I finished preparing the packages for buildd.
deb http://yamamoto.fam.cx/debian unreleased main
So, I would like to apply for using debian-ports infrastructure for ppc64 port.
I will open the details of ppc64 porting at http
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 01:02:49PM +, Hector Oron wrote:
> Hi Hiroyuki,
>
> 2011/2/27 Hiroyuki Yamamoto :
> > Hector Oron wrote:
> >> You said so a while back. Is this effort happening at some public
> >> site, would not be best try to use debian-ports.org or similar
> >> infrastructure? Be ca
Hi Hiroyuki,
2011/2/27 Hiroyuki Yamamoto :
> Hector Oron wrote:
>> You said so a while back. Is this effort happening at some public
>> site, would not be best try to use debian-ports.org or similar
>> infrastructure? Be careful with patches in BTS, those need to be
>> properly tagged and are like
Hector Oron wrote:
> You said so a while back. Is this effort happening at some public
> site, would not be best try to use debian-ports.org or similar
> infrastructure? Be careful with patches in BTS, those need to be
> properly tagged and are likely to bitrot if there is no proper
> maintainance.
Hi,
2011/2/27 Hiroyuki Yamamoto :
> Hector Oron wrote:
>> It looks like ppc64 port is no longer hosted in alioth,
>> <http://debian-ppc64.alioth.debian.org/>
Also mailing list has been removed, so dropping -CC
>> Does someone have a copy of ppc64-debian chroot
Hi,
Hector Oron wrote:
> It looks like ppc64 port is no longer hosted in alioth,
> <http://debian-ppc64.alioth.debian.org/>
>
> Does someone have a copy of ppc64-debian chroot and / or patches?
I am preparing to restart ppc64 port, so I am posting peculiar patches of
Hello,
It looks like ppc64 port is no longer hosted in alioth,
<http://debian-ppc64.alioth.debian.org/>
Does someone have a copy of ppc64-debian chroot and / or patches?
Cheers,
--
Héctor Orón
"Our Sun unleashes tremendous flares expelling hot gas into the Solar
System, wh
Hi,
>> The only problem
>> I had was trying to run IBM 64 bit SDK3.0 for CELL (from Barcelona's
>> Supercomputing Center) on 32 bit Debian.
>
> There ain't much of 64-bit external depends in IBM SDK, since it
> brings in most of the stuff. Off the top of my head I remember only
> libnuma (beside
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Hector Oron wrote:
> The problem on ppc 64 bit architecture was that Debian already has a 32
> bit port and it is more efficient on 64 bit architectures, because it
> uses more efficiently L2 cache on non FP instructions.
Yeah, I know :)
I currently wonder if it i
Hi Wart,
I have been running ppc64 port from
http://debian-ppc64.alioth.debian.org/ and it was fine when I tried it.
> While digging through d-i, I've noticed some signs of ppc64 port
> (which was, as far as I remember, a heroic attempt to make a 64-bit
> userland Debian port)
Hi there.
While digging through d-i, I've noticed some signs of ppc64 port
(which was, as far as I remember, a heroic attempt to make a 64-bit
userland Debian port).
Do we actually need it and is anybody going to support/maintain it?
--
Regards, Wartan.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
I have compiled a self-hosting 64 bit debian in a ibm pseries. It can be
download from:
ftp.las.ic.unicamp.br:/pub/debian-ppc64/debian-ppc64.tar.bz2
The biggest problem by now is in linking libpng. The linker is failing with
"unresolvable R_PPC64_REL24 relocation against symbol
`.png_malloc_def
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
