On Fri, Jan 28, 2000 at 06:54:00PM -0800, Alex Romosan wrote:
> i compiled perl 5.005.03-5.3 but i don't know how to sign the packages
> (i never did an NMU). i would appreciate any help. in the meantime you
> can get the packages from ftp://caliban.lbl.gov/pub/debian/powerpc/
I use dpkg-buildpack
Matt Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Uh oh, I'm more worried now that my fully upgraded potato box (excluding
> the broken console-data) can't build 5.005.03-5.x.
>
> Are you a developer? Can you make an NMU to master of these?
>
i compiled perl 5.005.03-5.3 but i don't know how to sign
Matt Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hrm. Ok, but I will let Alex do the upload since he appears to have
> -5.3 building from source (he did say later today).
the machine is in macos mode right now. expect the upload tonight when
i reboot it in linux. sorry for the delay.
--alex--
--
| I
On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 02:40:47PM -0700, Matt Porter wrote:
> Hrm. Ok, but I will let Alex do the upload since he appears to have -5.3
> building from source (he did say later today). I'll use a hacked perl and
> console-data to build boot-floppies in the meantime. I still don't see an
> upload o
On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 12:40:44PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 10:05:34AM -0700, Matt Porter wrote:
> > I'd suspect a kernel problem with 2.3.10, unless you're missing SysV IPC
> > support. My 2.2.9 PReP kernel only fails on the anydbm.t and ndbm.t when
> > it tries a
Matt Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > i had no problems building perl 5.005.03-5.2. i can make the debs
> > available if somebody wants them.
>
> Uh oh, I'm more worried now that my fully upgraded potato box (excluding
> the broken console-data) can't build 5.005.03-5.x.
>
> Are you a deve
On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 10:05:34AM -0700, Matt Porter wrote:
> I'd suspect a kernel problem with 2.3.10, unless you're missing SysV IPC
> support. My 2.2.9 PReP kernel only fails on the anydbm.t and ndbm.t when
> it tries an ndbm store. I get an errno 22, invalid argument. This is at
> line 101
On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 10:38:44AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 07:57:26AM -0700, Matt Porter wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 12:10:07AM -0800, Alex Romosan wrote:
> > > Matt Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > > Is anybody else having any luck? ndbm fai
On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 07:57:26AM -0700, Matt Porter wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 12:10:07AM -0800, Alex Romosan wrote:
> > Matt Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Is anybody else having any luck? ndbm fails in two tests and I don't
> > > see any talk of this problem. Full test lo
On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 12:10:07AM -0800, Alex Romosan wrote:
> Matt Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Is anybody else having any luck? ndbm fails in two tests and I don't
> > see any talk of this problem. Full test log is in bug #55932.
> >
>
> i had no problems building perl 5.005.03-
Matt Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is anybody else having any luck? ndbm fails in two tests and I don't
> see any talk of this problem. Full test log is in bug #55932.
>
i had no problems building perl 5.005.03-5.2. i can make the debs
available if somebody wants them.
--alex--
--
|
Is anybody else having any luck? ndbm fails in two tests and I don't
see any talk of this problem. Full test log is in bug #55932.
Suggestions are very welcome since we can't build boot-floppies until
this is fixed.
--
Matt Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is Linux Country. On a quiet night, you c
12 matches
Mail list logo
