Re: pbbuttonsd 0.5.9-2 unofficial package

2004-03-26 Thread Matthias Grimm
Am Freitag, 26. März 2004 04:04 schrieb Vincent Lefevre: > On 2004-03-26 03:46:06 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > Well, this is not related to packaging, but still I think that > > critically low is when the battery level drops below BWL_last value > > of the config file, by default it's 3. >

Re: pbbuttonsd 0.5.9-2 unofficial package

2004-03-26 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > Well I suspect it depends heavily from what your /proc/apm states about > > the subject of remaining time. > > > > Perhaps Matthias can give us more information on why he made this choice > > in the default configuration file? ... > > >From what *I* can tell the choice seems to be way better th

Re: pbbuttonsd 0.5.9-2 unofficial package

2004-03-26 Thread Soeren Sonnenburg
On Fri, 2004-03-26 at 10:26, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 04:04:50AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > > Well, this is not related to packaging, but still I think that > > > critically low is when the battery level drops below BWL_last value > > > of the config file, by defau

Re: pbbuttonsd 0.5.9-2 unofficial package

2004-03-26 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 04:04:50AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > Well, this is not related to packaging, but still I think that > > critically low is when the battery level drops below BWL_last value > > of the config file, by default it's 3. > Isn't it too low, considering that the remaining t

Re: pbbuttonsd 0.5.9-2 unofficial package

2004-03-25 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2004-03-26 03:46:06 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > Well, this is not related to packaging, but still I think that > critically low is when the battery level drops below BWL_last value > of the config file, by default it's 3. Isn't it too low, considering that the remaining time given by the

Re: pbbuttonsd 0.5.9-2 unofficial package

2004-03-25 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 12:07:34AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > Wouldn't it be better if onAC_sleep were "no" in the provided config > file? Yes, I agree, I will change it in the next version of the package. > What does "critically low" mean? Several weeks ago, pmud failed to put > my machine

Re: pbbuttonsd 0.5.9-2 unofficial package

2004-03-25 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Wouldn't it be better if onAC_sleep were "no" in the provided config file? Also the pbbuttonsd.conf(5) man page says: EmergencyAction = [action] (default: sleep) If the battery is critically low the machine have to be set into a safe state. This could be done on different ways.

pbbuttonsd 0.5.9-2 unofficial package

2004-03-24 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 02:23:44PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > deb http://www.bononia.it/~zack/ debian/ > deb-src http://www.bononia.it/~zack/ debian/ I've upgraded the pbbuttonsd package so that it Conflicts with pmud (no Replaces) and ships also pbbcmd (as pointed out in a recent post