On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 09:35:05PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Monday 30 October 2006 17:16, you wrote:
> > Mmm, are you able to boot d-i with 32MB on this box ?
>
> No.
You didn't tell us the size of the initramfs generated by initramfs-tools
though, as i asked you in the previous
Hi,
On Monday 30 October 2006 17:16, you wrote:
> Mmm, are you able to boot d-i with 32MB on this box ?
No.
regards,
Holger
pgpnFJg8GsQsz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi Holger,
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 11:41:50AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sunday 22 October 2006 13:54, Sven Luther wrote:
> > 1) using yaird instead of initramfs-tools, or initramfs-tools with the
> > modules=dep option.
>
> initramfs-tools with the dep option didnt help.
Can
Hi,
On Sunday 22 October 2006 13:54, Sven Luther wrote:
> 1) using yaird instead of initramfs-tools, or initramfs-tools with the
> modules=dep option.
initramfs-tools with the dep option didnt help.
I now added more memory and that helped :)
From experiementing with "mem=xM" append paramete
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 01:53:56AM -0700, brian wrote:
> i still don't get with the premature deletion.
> 18 is still in unstable, it is not in etch or
> even testing (and imho that is still correct).
> i believe franz said they were waiting until
> post freeze for that.
Notice that before .15 wa
--- Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sunday 22 October 2006 10:20, Benjamin
> Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > > > What is the exact problem ? I'm pretty sure
> I had 2.6.18 booting fine on
> > > > > a couple of oldworld boxes here before
> relase. (A fix for IDE on some
> >
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 07:38:02AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-10-22 at 13:54 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 10:41:58AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Sunday 22 October 2006 10:20, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > > What is th
On Sun, 2006-10-22 at 13:54 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 10:41:58AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sunday 22 October 2006 10:20, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > What is the exact problem ? I'm pretty sure I had 2.6.18 booting fine on
> > > a couple of old
On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 10:41:58AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sunday 22 October 2006 10:20, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > What is the exact problem ? I'm pretty sure I had 2.6.18 booting fine on
> > a couple of oldworld boxes here before relase. (A fix for IDE on some
> > perform
Hi,
On Sunday 22 October 2006 10:20, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> What is the exact problem ? I'm pretty sure I had 2.6.18 booting fine on
> a couple of oldworld boxes here before relase. (A fix for IDE on some
> performa went in later on, I think in 2.6.18.1)
The problem I see here (even on n
On Sun, 2006-10-22 at 10:13 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 08:38:06PM -0700, brian wrote:
> > i was figuring there was something wrong with
> > the 2.6.15 kernel. why it was deleted from
> > the debian archives when some old world power
> > macs still need it, and nobody respo
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 08:38:06PM -0700, brian wrote:
> i was figuring there was something wrong with
> the 2.6.15 kernel. why it was deleted from
> the debian archives when some old world power
> macs still need it, and nobody responding to
> any of my postings here.
This is a known problem, p
i was figuring there was something wrong with
the 2.6.15 kernel. why it was deleted from
the debian archives when some old world power
macs still need it, and nobody responding to
any of my postings here.
but today i find this:
http://packages.ubuntulinux.org/dapper/base/linux-image-2.6.15-23-po
13 matches
Mail list logo
