Re: libuno_sal.so.3 from OOo 2.0 needed

2006-04-02 Thread Wojciech Owczarek
On Sun, 2 Apr 2006 22:23:35 +0200 Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why are you using 1.9.x? I'm using a fresh m161 (between .0.2 and .0.3) build that Eric Bachard from the OOo team provided me two days ago (for my locale, I'm wild happy to have OOo 2.0 working finally on my powerbook),

Re: libuno_sal.so.3 from OOo 2.0 needed

2006-04-02 Thread Rene Engelhard
Wojciech Owczarek wrote: > I get some glibc symbol error with OOo that most probably will need a > rebuild of openoffice > (http://lists.debian.org/debian-glibc/2005/05/msg00030.html), but I > wonder if a quick dirty fix of substituting the libuno_sal.so.3 file Why are you using 1.9.x? > having t

libuno_sal.so.3 from OOo 2.0 needed

2006-04-02 Thread Wojciech Owczarek
Hi, I get some glibc symbol error with OOo that most probably will need a rebuild of openoffice (http://lists.debian.org/debian-glibc/2005/05/msg00030.html), but I wonder if a quick dirty fix of substituting the libuno_sal.so.3 file having that problem with a working one could save me. Can anybody