Re: kernel-package: some enhancements for all archs

Hi, __ > > I see another flaw there too, $SUB would be defined as "CHRP", but there > isn't a arch/ppc/CHRPboot, it's arch/ppc/chrpboot. > > Here's my version of that section (it has the added advantage of supporting > PowerMac a

Re: kernel-package: some enhancements for all archs

Hi, Thanks. I shall incorporate all this into the next release, which should be out real sonn now ;-) manoj -- Shit Happens. Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E

Re: kernel-package: some enhancements for all archs

At 16:04 -0700 1998-07-26, Manoj Srivastava wrote: >__ > ># SILO can boot gzip'ed kernel; m68k has vmlinuz, just the kernel makefiles ># don't seem to realise it. >#ifneq ($(strip $(architecture)),m68k) >ifeq ($(strip $(filter m68k

Re: kernel-package: some enhancements for all archs

> I like the subarch script. Thanks. I also like your proposal > for multiple .config files, which allows one to compile for several > architectures from the same source tree (I guess). However, I have > doscovered a flaw in the rules file you have: really possible :-) > > See, if

Re: kernel-package: some enhancements for all archs

Hi, I like the subarch script. Thanks. I also like your proposal for multiple .config files, which allows one to compile for several architectures from the same source tree (I guess). However, I have doscovered a flaw in the rules file you have: