> > > I don't like dependencies, and kernel-patch is one extra to build the
> > > images. The kernel-image packages is from the method the same as for
> > > i386 and alpha. Without the dependencies we must not play with debhelper,
> > > kernel-package and other possible buggy packages.
> >
> > I
Sorry about the turnaround time on this, life's been like that lately.
On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 03:42:51PM -0700, Matt Porter wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2000 at 11:52:37AM +0100, Hartmut Koptein wrote:
> > > I did try kernel-image packages; I found that kernel-patch worked much
> > > better. I've re
On Thu, Feb 10, 2000 at 11:52:37AM +0100, Hartmut Koptein wrote:
> > I did try kernel-image packages; I found that kernel-patch worked much
> > better. I've rewritten its rules almost from scratch. If you really
> > want to stick with kernel-image, I suppose that's OK, but there's no
>
> I don't
3 matches
Mail list logo
