Re: libc-6.2.2.5-13 was Re: kept back packages

2002-09-20 Thread simon . raven
On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 12:23:01 +0200, Francois AUDIBERT composed: > On September 19, Chris Tillman wrote: > > This is a debian-user or maybe debian-x question. The 'h' indicates > the package was put on hold. If you change that with + in aptitude, > won't it take it off hold? > > Yes, but re

Re: libc-6.2.2.5-13 was Re: kept back packages

2002-09-20 Thread simon . raven
[EMAIL PROTECTED](pts/2):simon# dpkg -l libc6 Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name VersionDescription +++-===

libc-6.2.2.5-13 was Re: kept back packages

2002-09-20 Thread Francois AUDIBERT
On September 19, Chris Tillman wrote: This is a debian-user or maybe debian-x question. The 'h' indicates the package was put on hold. If you change that with + in aptitude, won't it take it off hold? Yes, but replace hold with broken. In fact libc6 is 2.2.5-11on my machine and should be 2.2.5

Re: kept back packages

2002-09-19 Thread Chris Tillman
libxaw7 proxymngr xbase-clients xfs xfwp xlibmesa3 > xlibs xlibs-dev xnest xprt xserver-common xserver-xfree86 xterm xutils xvfb > 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 18 not upgraded. > JoeBar:/home/fat# >

kept back packages

2002-09-19 Thread FranI
ove and 18 not upgraded. JoeBar:/home/fat# Then the list of kept back packages as represented by aptitude : --\ Upgradable Packages --\ devel - Utilities and programs for software development --\ main - The main Debian archive ih