Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > Peter Cordes wrote:
> > > What version of gcc should I use to compile the kernel (from the BK
> > > tree). Are there any known problems with 2.95.3? I'm compiling for an
> > > SMP machine. (so reordering locking-related
"Geert Uytterhoeven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > Peter Cordes wrote:
> > > What version of gcc should I use to compile the kernel (from the BK
> > > tree).
> > > Are there any known problems with 2.95.3? I'm compiling for an SMP
> > > machine.
>
Jason E. Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Michel Daenzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> AFAIK that should only yet be a problem with gcc-3.0 (which in turn is needed
>> for ReiserFS yet).
> Speaking as one who would really like to have a journaling FS on my
> 80Gb FW drive, is ResierFS read
MC wrote:
>
> Before using ReiserFS (or any other filesystem) on a production system,
> or a system where you care about the data, I would suggest waiting until
You can stop right there. You should not be using 2.4 kernels on
any production system, not until at least 2.4.7. So says Alan Cox
and
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> Peter Cordes wrote:
> > What version of gcc should I use to compile the kernel (from the BK tree).
> > Are there any known problems with 2.95.3? I'm compiling for an SMP machine.
> > (so reordering locking-related things is a bigger problem than on UP.)
Before using ReiserFS (or any other filesystem) on a production system,
or a system where you care about the data, I would suggest waiting until
at least one or two minor kernel releases have appeared in which there
have been no fixes for the filesystem.
There were fixes to ReiserFS in both 2.4.2
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 04:03:11PM -0700, Jason E. Stewart wrote:
>
> Speaking as one who would really like to have a journaling FS on my
> 80Gb FW drive, is ResierFS ready for use on PPC? What about XFS??
reiserfs is not even ready for primetime on x86, there is some pretty
severe filesystem cor
Actually, for people who don't want to waste (or use constructively,
depending on your point of view) time screwing with
not-ready-for-prime-time stuff like {woody,sid} and/or 2.4.x
kernels, ReiserFS for 2.2 kernels works on powerpc but you have to
get the endian-challenged-processors' patch for it
"Jason E. Stewart" wrote:
> > AFAIK that should only yet be a problem with gcc-3.0 (which in turn is
> > needed for ReiserFS yet).
>
> Speaking as one who would really like to have a journaling FS on my
> 80Gb FW drive, is ResierFS ready for use on PPC?
'Ready' may be a bit exaggerated, but I've
"Michel Dänzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> AFAIK that should only yet be a problem with gcc-3.0 (which in turn is needed
> for ReiserFS yet).
Speaking as one who would really like to have a journaling FS on my
80Gb FW drive, is ResierFS ready for use on PPC? What about XFS??
Thanks!
jas.
Peter Cordes wrote:
>
> What version of gcc should I use to compile the kernel (from the BK tree).
> Are there any known problems with 2.95.3? I'm compiling for an SMP machine.
> (so reordering locking-related things is a bigger problem than on UP.)
AFAIK that should only yet be a problem with
What version of gcc should I use to compile the kernel (from the BK tree).
Are there any known problems with 2.95.3? I'm compiling for an SMP machine.
(so reordering locking-related things is a bigger problem than on UP.)
--
#define X(x,y) x##y
Peter Cordes ; e-mail: X([EMAIL PROTECTED] , ns.
12 matches
Mail list logo
