On Mon, Nov 09, 1998 at 01:52:32PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 1998 at 05:15:17PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 09, 1998 at 11:06:55AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 09, 1998 at 05:03:02PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > but this me
On Mon, Nov 09, 1998 at 05:15:17PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 1998 at 11:06:55AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 09, 1998 at 05:03:02PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > but this means that there is no way someone could run X in the
> > > current situation
On Mon, Nov 09, 1998 at 11:06:55AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 1998 at 05:03:02PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > but this means that there is no way someone could run X in the
> > current situation. Is it so difficult/long to rebuild this packages ?
> > or to upload them
On Mon, Nov 09, 1998 at 05:03:02PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> but this means that there is no way someone could run X in the
> current situation. Is it so difficult/long to rebuild this packages ?
> or to upload them
> ?
Well, if they already had the packages, they just need to not upgrade.
On Mon, Nov 09, 1998 at 10:35:29AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 1998 at 03:13:38AM -0600, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> > On Nov 09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > is it no problem to use xbase_3.3.2.3a-7.deb together with
> > > xlib6g_3.3.2.3-1.deb and xserver-fbdev_3.3.2.3-1.deb.
>
On Mon, Nov 09, 1998 at 03:13:38AM -0600, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> On Nov 09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > is it no problem to use xbase_3.3.2.3a-7.deb together with
> > xlib6g_3.3.2.3-1.deb and xserver-fbdev_3.3.2.3-1.deb.
>
> There probably is a problem, in that you need at least xbase-clients
>
On Nov 09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> is it no problem to use xbase_3.3.2.3a-7.deb together with
> xlib6g_3.3.2.3-1.deb and xserver-fbdev_3.3.2.3-1.deb.
There probably is a problem, in that you need at least xbase-clients
(and probably xterm) to have a decent X installation with a-7. My
understan
On Fri, Nov 06, 1998 at 01:52:30PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 06, 1998 at 09:23:00AM -0500, Brian White wrote:
> > It's up to you guys. I was told powerpc was ready except it needed kernel
> > 2.1, which I okayed.
>
> In that case, we'll wait for the next time around - hopefull
On Fri, Nov 06, 1998 at 09:23:00AM -0500, Brian White wrote:
> It's up to you guys. I was told powerpc was ready except it needed kernel
> 2.1, which I okayed.
In that case, we'll wait for the next time around - hopefully we should
be ready by then.
Dan
It's up to you guys. I was told powerpc was ready except it needed kernel
2.1, which I okayed.
> > debian/powerpc at present:
> > - has no X (until the new glibc is uploaded)
>
> debian/sparc at present:
> - has X albeit still slightly buggy but definitly usable, but we have to wait
> for the
10 matches
Mail list logo
