At 15:40 +0100 29 Dec 2001, Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's what it looked like from the gdb trace. I'll keep your patch
> solution around - even where __va_copy is defined for other archs it
> should not hurt to use it and work on a copy of va_list, right?
Since archs that don
On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 03:40:31PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > Does anyone have time to dig into bug #123015 a little? I've tried the
> > > obvious fix (make sure the built-in CRASHES_ON_STARTUP workaround is
> > > defined :)), but Mark Brown says that doesn't help. The only unstable
> >
>
> > Does anyone have time to dig into bug #123015 a little? I've tried the
> > obvious fix (make sure the built-in CRASHES_ON_STARTUP workaround is
> > defined :)), but Mark Brown says that doesn't help. The only unstable
>
> Another occurrence of reusing a va_list variable. Although in this
> cas
On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 04:03:52AM -0600, Aaron Schrab wrote:
> Another occurrence of reusing a va_list variable. Although in this
> case, it looks like it was just an oversight. In addition to fixing
That worked. I'm uploading just now.
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a da
At 18:16 -0600 28 Dec 2001, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone have time to dig into bug #123015 a little? I've tried the
> obvious fix (make sure the built-in CRASHES_ON_STARTUP workaround is
> defined :)), but Mark Brown says that doesn't help. The only unstable
Another occurr
5 matches
Mail list logo
