On Wednesday 25 April 2007 19:20, Antonio-M. Corbi Bellot wrote:
> Jack Malmostoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:30:27 +0200, Antonio-M. Corbi Bellot wrote:
> >> As other people in this list I had problems (well I couldn't obtain a
> >> dhcp ip from my router) with 2.6.20 (
Jack Malmostoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:30:27 +0200, Antonio-M. Corbi Bellot wrote:
>
>> As other people in this list I had problems (well I couldn't obtain a
>> dhcp ip from my router) with 2.6.20 (2.6.18 works flawlessly in this
>> aspect)
>
> One difference I see be
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:30:27 +0200, Antonio-M. Corbi Bellot wrote:
> As other people in this list I had problems (well I couldn't obtain a
> dhcp ip from my router) with 2.6.20 (2.6.18 works flawlessly in this
> aspect)
One difference I see between .18 and .20 is in the signal strength.
With .18
Hi list:
Just saw a new version of linux-image-2.6.20-1-powerpc (-3) and decided
to try it and see if I could connect with my wireless network.
As other people in this list I had problems (well I couldn't obtain a
dhcp ip from my router) with 2.6.20 (2.6.18 works flawlessly in this
aspect).
Well
4 matches
Mail list logo
