Dnia 07-01-2007, nie o godzinie 22:59 -0500, Albert Cahalan napisał(a):
> On 1/7/07, Simon Valiquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Also, even Matthias Klose (Debian maintainer for GCC) did mark the
> > package priority as low.
>
> The package priority is shared with x86 and x86-64. As arch
On 1/7/07, Simon Valiquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Also, even Matthias Klose (Debian maintainer for GCC) did mark the
package priority as low.
The package priority is shared with x86 and x86-64. As architectures
go, powerpc is probably a distant third in importance. The priority
really
Santiago Vila un jour écrivit:
Etch is frozen. Do you realize what it means?
The gcc release fixing this build-depends on glibc 2.4 on the powerpc
architecture. Having glibc 2.4 in etch is not unlikely, it's impossible.
While we are at it, correct me if I'm wrong, but from what I've read
this
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Albert Cahalan wrote:
> On 1/6/07, Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Since you ask: Rebuilding everything at once (via binary-only NMUs)
> > is a lot of work, and IMHO unlikely to happen, at least in the near future.
>
> This is terrible. Etch needs this.
>
> Well,
On 1/6/07, Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Albert Cahalan wrote:
> Bugs 382741 and 382748 in gcc just got fixed
> in the gcc 4.1.1ds2-30 package.
>
> Rebuilding all packages is the next step to making
> ppc secure.
From the bug report:
> After this gets fixed, the
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Albert Cahalan wrote:
> Bugs 382741 and 382748 in gcc just got fixed
> in the gcc 4.1.1ds2-30 package.
>
> Rebuilding all packages is the next step to making
> ppc secure.
>From the bug report:
> After this gets fixed, the whole damn system needs
> to be rebuilt. I don't kno
Bugs 382741 and 382748 in gcc just got fixed
in the gcc 4.1.1ds2-30 package.
Rebuilding all packages is the next step to making
ppc secure.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
7 matches
Mail list logo