Re: a try at dri

2002-07-08 Thread Michel Dänzer
You're right, even the longer reply isn't as long as I thought... On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 20:25, Michael Furr wrote: > > Added the ModulePath to my XF86Config-4: > ModulePath "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules-dri-trunk" > ModulePath "/usr[/local]/X11R6/lib/modules BTW I have upda

Re: a try at dri [WOOT!]

2002-07-08 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 23:55, Toby Sargeant wrote: > On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 12:37:53AM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote: > > Hardly, the example XF86Config and all my XF86Configs show a similar > > discrepancy (79.815 vs. 79.816) but work fine. > > All I can say is that on this machine, (TiBook 800MHz,

Re: a try at dri [WOOT!]

2002-07-08 Thread Toby Sargeant
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 12:37:53AM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote: > Hardly, the example XF86Config and all my XF86Configs show a similar > discrepancy (79.815 vs. 79.816) but work fine. All I can say is that on this machine, (TiBook 800MHz, 1024x854) the difference *was* important. Toby. -- To UN

Re: a try at dri [WOOT!]

2002-07-08 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 23:27, Toby Sargeant wrote: > On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:38:57PM -0400, Michael Furr wrote: > > > > I'm not sure exactly what part of the file is different, the only thing > > I really noticed is that page flipping is enabled, but I don't think > > that would be it. > > I di

Re: a try at dri [WOOT!]

2002-07-08 Thread Toby Sargeant
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:38:57PM -0400, Michael Furr wrote: > > I'm not sure exactly what part of the file is different, the only thing > I really noticed is that page flipping is enabled, but I don't think > that would be it. > I discovered (the very hard way) that fbset -x reports a dotclock

Re: a try at dri [WOOT!]

2002-07-08 Thread Michael Furr
On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 15:03, Michel Dänzer wrote: > Look at > /usr/share/doc/xserver-xfree86-dri-trunk/examples/XF86Config-4.radeon. That's what I had originally based my config file on. However, now when I just copied that into place, changed the keyboard to "us", it works(even at 1280)! Thanks!

Re: a try at dri

2002-07-08 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 20:25, Michael Furr wrote: > > I just got an 800mhz TiBook and don't quite have X working yet... > I've read the last couple months of this list, and wow, lots of juicy > info. (you guys rock!). > > Short story is, X starts, but the screen is wavy and the cursor is > shadowe

Re: a try at dri

2002-07-08 Thread Jesus Climent
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 06:38:45PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I just got an 800mhz TiBook and don't quite have X working yet... > > I've read the last couple months of this list, and wow, lots of juicy > > info. (you guys rock!). > > I have a 667 TiBook on the way. I've been lurking for

Re: a try at dri

2002-07-08 Thread gphat
> I just got an 800mhz TiBook and don't quite have X working yet... > I've read the last couple months of this list, and wow, lots of juicy > info. (you guys rock!). I have a 667 TiBook on the way. I've been lurking for a few days, saving emails that will help me when the bugger gets here. Is t

a try at dri

2002-07-08 Thread Michael Furr
hi all, I just got an 800mhz TiBook and don't quite have X working yet... I've read the last couple months of this list, and wow, lots of juicy info. (you guys rock!). Short story is, X starts, but the screen is wavy and the cursor is shadowed about 2 inches to the right. (ring any bells?) Here