On Tue, Jun 22, 1999 at 09:08:38PM -0700, bigj wrote:
> Maybe someone can explain the differences b/w the different X servers (i.e
> Xpmac vs XF68_FBDev) and what is needed to get stable accelerated X
> support?
> urls will be welcomed as well.
>
Hello, ...
XF86_FBDev is an X server that will wo
Maybe someone can explain the differences b/w the different X servers (i.e
Xpmac vs XF68_FBDev) and what is needed to get stable accelerated X
support?
urls will be welcomed as well.
On Mon, 21 Jun 1999, Hugh Caley wrote:
> Also as an FYI, Xpmac_mga works fine to accelerate my preset PB G3 (Lomba
On Tue, 22 Jun 1999, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 1999 at 10:13:15PM -0700, bigj wrote:
> > > > XF86_FBDev accellerated? Or just I should give parameter in XF86Config
> > > > and/or BootX and/or fbset ? (I'm really new to Mac hardware :)
> > >
> > > You must use atyfb to get acceleration o
On Mon, Jun 21, 1999 at 10:13:15PM -0700, bigj wrote:
>
> > > XF86_FBDev accellerated? Or just I should give parameter in XF86Config
> > > and/or BootX and/or fbset ? (I'm really new to Mac hardware :)
> >
> > You must use atyfb to get acceleration on ATI Mach64.
> >
>
> Geert et al,
>The p
> > XF86_FBDev accellerated? Or just I should give parameter in XF86Config
> > and/or BootX and/or fbset ? (I'm really new to Mac hardware :)
>
> You must use atyfb to get acceleration on ATI Mach64.
>
Geert et al,
The problem is not as simple. The G3 laptops have a different kind of
video
On Wed, 16 Jun 1999, luther sven wrote:
> Ok, I gave it a look, ...
>
> First you are using offb, which don't seem to set the accel flag, so it is
> normal that the X server don't recognizes the chip.
>
> So first you have to get a fbdev that sets the accel flag correctly, don't
> know if the o
Ok, I gave it a look, ...
First you are using offb, which don't seem to set the accel flag, so it is
normal that the X server don't recognizes the chip.
So first you have to get a fbdev that sets the accel flag correctly, don't know
if the offb is capable of that, best would be to ask on the fb
On Tue, 15 Jun 1999, Hartmut Koptein wrote:
> > Actually, it was an incomplete merge of VGER code. Try 2.2.10.
>
> 2.2.10 has also a problem on chrp (dunno about booting):
>
> make[1]: Entering directory
> `/project/Linux/kernel-source-2.2.10-2.2.10/arch/ppc/chrpboot'
> ./piggyback image < ../
> Actually, it was an incomplete merge of VGER code. Try 2.2.10.
2.2.10 has also a problem on chrp (dunno about booting):
make[1]: Entering directory
`/project/Linux/kernel-source-2.2.10-2.2.10/arch/ppc/chrpboot'
./piggyback image < ../coffboot/vmlinux.gz | as -o image.o
cksum = 6b3cd8a3
make[1
On Tue, 15 Jun 1999, Travis Beals wrote:
> What I'd like to know is how you got 2.2.9 to compile for PPC... I've
> been working on that forever--it seems that 2.2.8 broke syscalls.c and
> maybe also pmac_setup.c for PPC. I think the errors may only be relevant
> if you have IDE enabled (Power
Travis Beals wrote:
> That works fine, although my X server dies every once in a while if I
> switch from it to another shell and back.
This also happens to me. I'm using pm2fb on my Amiga. So it seems it's an X
server and/or kernel problem.
Michel
--
Coming to you live from a finite point
>sorry for my lameness, but I had a video=atyfb parameter in BootX and
>Mach64 support in the kernel, but not for virtual frame buffer - I had
>strange crash at boot time when I use a self-compiled 2.2.9 kernel (I
>should try to enable/disable various driver/modules to find the problem,
>but I don'
On Tue, 15 Jun 1999, Igor Falcomata' wrote:
> Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > > [...]
> > > > (**) FBDev: Using default frame buffer video mode
> > > > (--) FBDev: Frame buffer device: OFfb ATY,RageLT
> > ^^^
> > > > (--) FBDev: Video memory: 1536K @
Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > (**) FBDev: Using default frame buffer video mode
> > > (--) FBDev: Frame buffer device: OFfb ATY,RageLT
> ^^^
> > > (--) FBDev: Video memory: 1536K @ 0x82800800
> > > (--) FBDev: MMIO regs: 0K @ (nil)
> >
On Mon, 14 Jun 1999, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 1999 at 03:28:02PM +0200, Igor Falcomata' wrote:
> > Sven LUTHER wrote:
> >
> > > There are still some problems with some ATI boards with the accelerated X
> > > server i made.
> >
> > Yepp,
> > (please excuse my bad english)
> >
> > on m
On Mon, Jun 14, 1999 at 03:28:02PM +0200, Igor Falcomata' wrote:
> Sven LUTHER wrote:
>
> > There are still some problems with some ATI boards with the accelerated X
> > server i made.
>
> Yepp,
> (please excuse my bad english)
>
> on my powerbook g3/233 with ati rage-lt I'm unable to run your s
Sven LUTHER wrote:
> There are still some problems with some ATI boards with the accelerated X
> server i made.
Yepp,
(please excuse my bad english)
on my powerbook g3/233 with ati rage-lt I'm unable to run your server
accellerated..
dmesg:
[...]
MacOS display is /pci/ATY,RageLTPro
Using unsup
Hello, ...
There are still some problems with some ATI boards with the accelerated X
server i made.
I know that Hartmut has such problems with his aty-XClaim board (RagePro, 4MB
SGRAM).
Also i had a report of problems with a Mach64 GT (0x4754 rev 0x41, 2M EDO)
based board.
You know i am in the
18 matches
Mail list logo
