On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 05:41:56AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> /proc/fb is a file not a directory too, at least on 2.2.
I'll just test -e, then.
--
G. Branden Robinson | One man's theology is another man's
Debian GNU/Linux| belly laugh.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 04:57:13AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> > Do you want an xserver-xfree86 debconf question for "UseFBDev"? I only
> > need to ask if [ -d /dev/fb ], correct?
>
> /proc/fb is better, /dev/fb* should be there on any Debian system (at least
> those not running devfs). "Use
Here is what I use on my iMac DV, not sure if it's perfect, but it
works properly for me:
Section "Monitor"
Identifier "Monitor0"
HorizSync31.5 - 70.0
VertRefresh 40.0 - 150.0
ModeLine "1024x768" 78.5 1024 1033 1129 1312 768 769 772 800 +hsync
+vsync
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 04:57:13AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > Also, some kind of patch adding -fPIC for building static libraries will
> > > have to be applied, or a lot of shared libraries will break on powerpc.
[...]
> My patch there should do IMHO, but I'd like to get some confirmation fr
Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 04:57:13AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > > And why don't you apply the Dashed Bresenham fix as well?
> > >
> > > Because I forgot about it, and don't know where it is.
> >
> > Attached to this mail, for example. :)
>
> Okay, will add.
Thank
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 04:57:13AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > And why don't you apply the Dashed Bresenham fix as well?
> >
> > Because I forgot about it, and don't know where it is.
>
> Attached to this mail, for example. :)
Okay, will add.
> > Do you want an xserver-xfree86 debconf que
Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 04:22:01AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > Branden Robinson wrote:
> > >
> > > I'd like feedback on these packages, please, to the debian-x list.
> >
> > DRI is for Direct Rendering Infrastructure, not Interface.
>
> Whoops. And usually I'm suc
Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 03:25:44PM -0700, crombie wrote:
> > feedback for imac, 266mhz, 32mb ram for version 4.1.x
> > gotten via ftp.digex.com
>
> Please mail the list(s), not me privately.
>
> > will not install due to invalid vid modes.
>
> Technically, this isn't
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 03:25:44PM -0700, crombie wrote:
> feedback for imac, 266mhz, 32mb ram for version 4.1.x
> gotten via ftp.digex.com
Please mail the list(s), not me privately.
> will not install due to invalid vid modes.
Technically, this isn't an installation issue, but a configuration i
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 04:22:01AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> Branden Robinson wrote:
> >
> > I'd like feedback on these packages, please, to the debian-x list.
>
> DRI is for Direct Rendering Infrastructure, not Interface.
Whoops. And usually I'm such a stickler for correct terminology. I'
Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> I'd like feedback on these packages, please, to the debian-x list.
DRI is for Direct Rendering Infrastructure, not Interface.
It seems you have applied my r128 Xv endianness fix, why don't you mention it
in the changelog? And why don't you apply the Dashed Bresenham
I'd like feedback on these packages, please, to the debian-x list.
I haven't received any patches for any architectures other than these. I'm
especially concerned about alpha (from which I at least have a report that
it built okay) and arm (about which I have heard nothing at all). If I
don't ge
12 matches
Mail list logo
