Re: X and Woody

2000-11-20 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > Fine, when is -6 due? > > The correct answer is always, "when it's ready". But I just uploaded it to > auric's incoming. OK; I'll pick it up ASAP. But anything in the range of 'in a matter of weeks' to 'sometime next year' would have been sufficient for me - I just wanted to know if I shoul

Re: X and Woody

2000-11-19 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 02:25:45PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote: > Fine, when is -6 due? The correct answer is always, "when it's ready". But I just uploaded it to auric's incoming. Nag me about this kind of thing in the future at your own peril. :-P > The last 4.01 gave funny patch errors ('

Re: X and Woody

2000-11-19 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > *nods* But, there's a patch in BTS for AXP that would solve our builds > > if tweaked propely. I'm waiting for it to be applied. > > It will be in 4.0.1-6. I've already applied it. Fine, when is -6 due? > I'd be more than happy to get PowerPC diffs against 4.0.1-6 as soon I have > relea

Re: X and Woody

2000-11-18 Thread Branden Robinson
On Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at 02:09:13PM -0500, Chad Miller wrote: > On Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at 07:18:37PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > I wonder if it's safe to try to compile them from source. > > > > Sure, just don't expect to build Debian packages for XFree86 4.01. The > > packaging for PPC was b

Re: X and Woody

2000-11-17 Thread Patrice LaFlamme
Speaking of X and woody, I unfortunately deleted my older xlibs6g-dev package from Xfree86-3.3.6... where can I find it again? I need to compile X apps, but I can't because the X 4.0.1 packages are still broken (no, this isn't a whine against broken X 4, just that I can't find X 3

Re: X and Woody

2000-11-17 Thread Michael Schmitz
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at 07:18:37PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > I wonder if it's safe to try to compile them from source. > > > > Sure, just don't expect to build Debian packages for XFree86 4.01. The > > packaging for PPC was broken last thing I heard. > > *nods* But, there's a patch i

Re: X and Woody

2000-11-17 Thread Chad Miller
On Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at 07:18:37PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > I wonder if it's safe to try to compile them from source. > > Sure, just don't expect to build Debian packages for XFree86 4.01. The > packaging for PPC was broken last thing I heard. *nods* But, there's a patch in BTS for AXP

Re: X and Woody

2000-11-17 Thread Michael Schmitz
> I wonder if it's safe to try to compile them from source. Sure, just don't expect to build Debian packages for XFree86 4.01. The packaging for PPC was broken last thing I heard. Michael

Re: X and Woody

2000-11-17 Thread Phil Fraering
> the missing xlibs and xserver-xfree86 packages were up on branden's page, > but have disappeared now. i imagine they will be published once they become > a little more stable, although i personally am using them without any > problems. I wonder if it's safe to try to compile them from source.

Re: X and Woody

2000-11-17 Thread dog
sculpsit Matthew.J.Reda: > I just installed woody and it seems that the .debs available do not > make up a complete X package. I thought about building them myself, > using the source and the PowerMac X development branch available from > penguinppc.org, but I don't have enough space on my Linu

X and Woody

2000-11-17 Thread Matthew J. Reda
I just installed woody and it seems that the .debs available do not make up a complete X package. I thought about building them myself, using the source and the PowerMac X development branch available from penguinppc.org, but I don't have enough space on my Linux partition to do the complete build