On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 09:59:42PM +0100, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 06:44:50PM +, Sergio Brandano wrote:
> >
> > Just a note.
> >
> > Was X version 4 supposed to be that magic next step,
> > where companies like ATI and Matrox could make
> > their own drivers? Was X ver
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 06:44:50PM +, Sergio Brandano wrote:
>
> Just a note.
>
> Was X version 4 supposed to be that magic next step,
> where companies like ATI and Matrox could make
> their own drivers? Was X version 4 supposed to have
Yes, but only NVIDIA is doing it, both matrox and
> From: Sergio Brandano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Was X version 4 supposed to be that magic next step,
The magic here is yours only.
> where companies like ATi and Matrox could make
> their own drivers? Was X version 4 supposed to have
Could and can. Doesn't mean they w
Just a note.
Was X version 4 supposed to be that magic next step,
where companies like ATI and Matrox could make
their own drivers? Was X version 4 supposed to have
a mechanism for which these drivers could be addedd
modularly with no need to hack the main code? Was
that one of the reasons
So in order to get X working properly on a Lombard one must:
a) run stable instead of testing
b) run testing with X 4.0.2 and apply the patches manually
c) run testing but downgrade X back to the stable version
d) wait for the patches to be integrated into XFree86 v 4.0.3 and thus
into debian's tes
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 03:36:21PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> [Sorry for the CC, Ani; I don't know if you subscribe to this list.]
>
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 12:15:54PM -0800, Ani Joshi wrote:
> > Wrong, its not that I "can't" seem to get the modifications in the tree,
> > its because I hav
Ani Joshi wrote:
>
> Wrong, its not that I "can't" seem to get the modifications in the tree,
> its because I haven't even submitted them yet. I'm waiting for feedback
> from some users before I do that, and that will only happen before the
> next release.
Have you discussed your approach of for
[Sorry for the CC, Ani; I don't know if you subscribe to this list.]
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 12:15:54PM -0800, Ani Joshi wrote:
> Wrong, its not that I "can't" seem to get the modifications in the tree,
> its because I haven't even submitted them yet. I'm waiting for feedback
> from some users be
Wrong, its not that I "can't" seem to get the modifications in the tree,
its because I haven't even submitted them yet. I'm waiting for feedback
from some users before I do that, and that will only happen before the
next release. I don't have time to keep updating my tree with CVS all day
to ple
9 matches
Mail list logo
