On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 03:26:56PM -0300, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
> On 09/16/2014 12:45 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >atlas FTBFS, we don't seem to have a patch for this one
> >bzr #760054 - Not specific to ppc64el
> >gaucheFTBFS, we don't seem to have a patch for
On 09/16/2014 12:45 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
atlas FTBFS, we don't seem to have a patch for this one
bzr #760054 - Not specific to ppc64el
gaucheFTBFS, we don't seem to have a patch for this one
gccxmlFTBFS, we don't seem to have a patch for this one
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 05:48:51PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> A quick note about this one. Andi Barth has started to debug that, and
> I have continued a bit. The following code doesn't work correctly on
> ppc64el, printing twice a positive value.
This exact behaviour is tested in the boost te
On 09/16/2014 01:08 PM, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
>libkolabxml FTBFS, seems to be a problem with boost::math::changesign
[...]
For this one, I'm asking someone who should known Boost for ppc64/el well.
Submitted #761926 (boost1.55) and #761934 (libkolabxml symbols).
--
Mauricio Far
On 09/16/2014 12:48 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>bugs). We should still try to fix them if possible. I have tried to
>identify packages that are important either because of the
>functionality they provide or because the number of packages which
>build-depends on them. Here is a first list:
Many t
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 05:45:45PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On the packages side the status is quite good and a big part of the
> build failures are for leaf packages that might not fully necessary for
> the release (and some of them also will not be in Jessie as they have RC
> bugs). We shou
Hi all,
The architecture qualification meeting last Sunday has decided that
arm64 and ppc64el will be "in principle" released with Jessie. This
means that they will be released providing enough progress is done
before the release (and ideally before the freeze).
On the hardware side things seems
7 matches
Mail list logo
