Re: Why gcc-2.95.4

2002-05-31 Thread Christopher C. Chimelis
On Fri, 31 May 2002, Tom Rini wrote: > IIRC, CVS version of gcc-2.95 is at .4, which may or may not ever be > released. But it has fixes over .3. This is mostly true. The 2.95 branch was never officially closed and code has been added since 2.95.3 was released, but it's doubtful that we'll see

Re: Why gcc-2.95.4

2002-05-31 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 10:45:00AM +1000, Brendan J Simon wrote: > > I've noticed that my PowerMacs have gcc 2.95.4 running (reported by "gcc > -v") but the gnu web site and mirror sites show no existance of such a > version. The latest official version in the 2.95 series is 2.95.3. > > I assu

Why gcc-2.95.4

2002-05-30 Thread Brendan J Simon
I've noticed that my PowerMacs have gcc 2.95.4 running (reported by "gcc -v") but the gnu web site and mirror sites show no existance of such a version. The latest official version in the 2.95 series is 2.95.3. I assume that debian porters have increased the match number as there have been