Hi,
tried; no difference :-(
Still at loss
Matthias
david schrieb:
I understand your router preference, my observation is that the
default route for a network is often associated with the first device
(ip number) in a given subnet ie with 192.168.0.0 the first device is
192.168.0.1 - the only th
I understand your router preference, my observation is that the default
route for a network is often associated with the first device (ip
number) in a given subnet ie with 192.168.0.0 the first device is
192.168.0.1 - the only thing i noticed in your setup was that the two
routers were effectiv
Hi,
actually I do not want to use the ISDN router at all except as a backup
- mostly it is switched off anyway and it was when I first tried network
access. I used it just on a hunch that there might be a problem with my
DSL connection. I tried the setup from Knoppix and using the route
command
My thoughts..
Putting the two gateways on the same subnet may not be a good idea
(192.168.0.0). Can you test with one gateway device on 192.168.0.1 and
the other on 192.168.1.1 (for example).
david
Dr. Matthias Dräger wrote:
Sure - here is the network config and a small demonstration. With the
Can you post the routing table output with regard to the two instances, ie
the output of "route -n"
d
> Hi!
>
> I have a weired network problem. I have an ISDN router on 192.168.0.1
> and a DSL router on 192.168.0.2. Both work nicely from other OS. Now I
> set up the default route to point to teh
Hi!
I have a weired network problem. I have an ISDN router on 192.168.0.1
and a DSL router on 192.168.0.2. Both work nicely from other OS. Now I
set up the default route to point to teh ISDN router with "route add
default gw 192.168.0.1" and everything is up and running over ISDN.
Traceroute to
6 matches
Mail list logo
