> hehehhe, thanks. i'm not like desperate, but when i hear of other
> people's kernel compilations taking under 2 hours never mind 10 minutes
The worst I remember: over 30 hours on an old 16 MHz 80386.
The best: certainly under 2 minutes, likely under 1 by now.
> or so, i started wondering if i c
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 00:07:01 -0500, Albert D. Cahalan composed:
>
> Statically link things used during the build.
>
> ...
> How desperate are you? Maybe you should go cook dinner while the
> kernel is compiling. Lack of food has been shown to cause death.
>
hehehhe, thanks. i'm not like d
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 11:14:22 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] composed:
> > i use make-kpkg usually :|, hm, edit the scripts to do so maybe?
>
> Just add:
> CONCURRENCY_LEVEL := 2
> in your /etc/kernel-pkg.conf file.
> -Brett
wow, all the really good advice, thanks to all. and a TIA if you don't
get
On Jan 21 2003, Michel Lanners wrote:
> - more memory will help; but 84 MB is not _that_ bad, unless you have
> plenty of other things going on.
Interleaving the memory cards (if applicable) may also help.
[]s, Roger...
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
On 21 Jan, this message from Geert Uytterhoeven echoed through cyberspace:
> On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> just wondering, how long *does* it take to build a kernel on say,
>> voltaire or the x86 (C3 was it?), cuz here a kernel build is about 2
>> hours - 604e/185 MHz, 84 MB RAM.
> i use make-kpkg usually :|, hm, edit the scripts to do so maybe?
Just add:
CONCURRENCY_LEVEL := 2
in your /etc/kernel-pkg.conf file.
-Brett
> simon
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> just wondering, how long *does* it take to build a kernel on say,
> voltaire or the x86 (C3 was it?), cuz here a kernel build is about 2
> hours - 604e/185 MHz, 84 MB RAM.
>
> is there a way to speed this up to say 1 hour, or 1 hour 1/2 without
> up
> just wondering, how long *does* it take to build a kernel on say,
> voltaire or the x86 (C3 was it?), cuz here a kernel build is about 2
> hours - 604e/185 MHz, 84 MB RAM.
>
> is there a way to speed this up to say 1 hour, or 1 hour 1/2 without
> upgrading the CPU? more RAM maybe? i don't have
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 17:00:34 -0600, vinai composed:
>
> > On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Thread your "make" jobs with the -j switch, e.g.
> >
> > $ make -j2 vmlinux
>
> i use make-kpkg usually :|, hm, edit the scripts to do so maybe?
I don't have any experience with
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 17:00:34 -0600, vinai composed:
> On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Thread your "make" jobs with the -j switch, e.g.
>
> $ make -j2 vmlinux
>
> I'm not sure how much it will help, but it is something fairly easy you
> can try. The caveat is a few times
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> just wondering, how long *does* it take to build a kernel on say,
> voltaire or the x86 (C3 was it?), cuz here a kernel build is about
> 2 hours - 604e/185 MHz, 84 MB RAM.
>
> is there a way to speed this up to say 1 hour, or 1 hour 1/2 without
> upgr
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 10:11:21PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> just wondering, how long *does* it take to build a kernel on say,
> voltaire or the x86 (C3 was it?), cuz here a kernel build is about 2
> hours - 604e/185 MHz, 84 MB RAM.
Around 7 minutes.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
just wondering, how long *does* it take to build a kernel on say,
voltaire or the x86 (C3 was it?), cuz here a kernel build is about 2
hours - 604e/185 MHz, 84 MB RAM.
is there a way to speed this up to say 1 hour, or 1 hour 1/2 without
upgrading the CPU? more RAM maybe? i don't have 200-300$ to
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 07:22:47AM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 10:35:02AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 12:30:59PM +1100, Ross Vumbaca wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Craig Morehouse wrote:
> > > >Has anyone tried running Linux on this poard?
> > > >
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 10:35:02AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 12:30:59PM +1100, Ross Vumbaca wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Craig Morehouse wrote:
> > >Has anyone tried running Linux on this poard?
> > >
> > >If successful, please reply both on-list and off, if you don't mind.
> >
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 12:17:02PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 10:56:30AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > BTW, do someone know if it is possible to install debian using
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 10:56:30AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > BTW, do someone know if it is possible to install debian using the boot
> > > floppies trough a serial console ? My current attempts makes
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 10:56:30AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Sven Luther wrote:
> > BTW, do someone know if it is possible to install debian using the boot
> > floppies trough a serial console ? My current attempts makes the serial
> > console show the kernel boot log
Hi,
Michael D. Crawford wrote:
Although the extra services required for x86 might be cheaper to install
at first than the more expensive TerraSoft motherboard, the power bills
you receive would probably eat any savings in a few months.
Just a quick reminder to all that they are not called "T
The real advantage of the PowerPC motherboard becomes much more apparent when
you...
(drum roll please...)
Imagine A Beowulf Cluster Of These
If you had a 72" rackmount cabinet fully populated with 1U x86 motherboards in
your home, I expect you would need to install special power and air cond
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Sven Luther wrote:
> BTW, do someone know if it is possible to install debian using the boot
> floppies trough a serial console ? My current attempts makes the serial
> console show the kernel boot log all right, and the first debian boot
> floppy screen, but when the install d
Rogério Brito wrote:
On Jan 19 2003, Craig Morehouse wrote:
Has anyone tried running Linux on this poard?
If successful, please reply both on-list and off, if you don't mind.
Please, forgive my ignorance on the subject, but I see that
lately people are talking more an
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 01:44:25AM -0200, Rogério Brito wrote:
> On Jan 19 2003, Craig Morehouse wrote:
> > Has anyone tried running Linux on this poard?
> >
> > If successful, please reply both on-list and off, if you don't mind.
>
> Please, forgive my ignorance on the subject, but I see t
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 12:30:59PM +1100, Ross Vumbaca wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Craig Morehouse wrote:
> >Has anyone tried running Linux on this poard?
> >
> >If successful, please reply both on-list and off, if you don't mind.
>
> Yes. I have the "AmigaOne" PowerPC board. The "Terrasoft" PowerPC board
Hi,
Rogério Brito wrote:
On Jan 19 2003, Craig Morehouse wrote:
Has anyone tried running Linux on this poard?
If successful, please reply both on-list and off, if you don't mind.
Please, forgive my ignorance on the subject, but I see that
lately people are talking more and
On Jan 19 2003, Craig Morehouse wrote:
> Has anyone tried running Linux on this poard?
>
> If successful, please reply both on-list and off, if you don't mind.
Please, forgive my ignorance on the subject, but I see that
lately people are talking more and more about such boards for
Hi,
Craig Morehouse wrote:
Has anyone tried running Linux on this poard?
If successful, please reply both on-list and off, if you don't mind.
Yes. I have the "AmigaOne" PowerPC board. The "Terrasoft" PowerPC board
(from "MAI") and the AmigaOne are basically the same board, except that
the A
Has anyone tried running Linux on this poard?
If successful, please reply both on-list and off, if you don't mind.
Thanks
CAM
28 matches
Mail list logo
