Just for the record, here's my current status:
I wrote:
it seems there are three possibilities now:
- run linux with MOL under pearpc, and Mac OS 9 under MOL
I couldn't get linux under pearpc to run, also as I said the version in
Debian is compiled for 64 bit and thus doesn't use the JIT so
Christian Jaeger wrote:
Jérôme Warnier wrote:
In this case, why bother using MOL?
Just install Mac OS 9 directly under your qemu VM.
We're waiting for your confirmation that you have first-hand experience
of running Mac OS 9 directly under qemu, or can refer to reports of
doing that successf
Jérôme Warnier wrote:
In this case, why bother using MOL?
Just install Mac OS 9 directly under your qemu VM.
We're waiting for your confirmation that you have first-hand experience
of running Mac OS 9 directly under qemu, or can refer to reports of
doing that successfully.
On http://www.cla
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 03:50:38AM +0200, Christian Jaeger wrote:
> So I guess I'm back at using MOL under a linux/ppc (since MOL didn't
> require these driver partitions, and didn't have any issue loading the
> Mac OS 9).
I just tried it, and I couldn't get OS9 to run under qemu even
with the o
Christian Jaeger wrote:
So I guess I'm back at using MOL under a linux/ppc (since MOL didn't
require these driver partitions, and didn't have any issue loading the
Mac OS 9).
Still out of luck:
# create a file named "lenny" of 3.5G size (mksparse is a script of mine)
$ mksparse 3.5G lenny
#
Brad Boyer wrote:
Weren't you trying to run OS9? This is definitely OSX, as the classic
MacOS didn't use mach for its kernel.
Hm, strange, I wasn't aware that any OS X stuff was on that partition as
well. And when booting that partition through MOL it definitely booted
OS 9 (but iirc one c
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 07:31:41PM +0200, Christian Jaeger wrote:
> With mac99 it goes further (shows graphical output for a moment, then
> back to a text screen, with messages "Unresolved kernel trap(cpu 0):
> 0x700 Program DSISR=0x4200 DAR=... generating stack backtrace prior
> to panic ..
Brad Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 06:46:43PM +0200, Christian Jaeger wrote:
$ qemu-system-ppc -M \?
Supported machines are:
g3bw Heathrow based PowerMAC (default)
mac99 Mac99 based PowerMAC
prep PowerPC PREP platform
ref405ep ref405ep
taihu taihu
Using -M prep
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 06:46:43PM +0200, Christian Jaeger wrote:
> $ qemu-system-ppc -M \?
> Supported machines are:
> g3bw Heathrow based PowerMAC (default)
> mac99 Mac99 based PowerMAC
> prep PowerPC PREP platform
> ref405ep ref405ep
> taihu taihu
>
> Using -M prep shows
Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
I didn't try running MacOS, but my (Ubuntu's) qemu has:
| $ qemu-system-ppc -M ?
| Supported machines are:
| g3bw Heathrow based PowerMAC (default)
| mac99 Mac99 based PowerMAC
| prep PowerPC PREP platform
| ref405ep ref405ep
| taihu taihu
T
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 04:36:44PM +0200, Christian Jaeger wrote:
> Basilisk II won't run Mac OS 9, from what I read.
As far as I know, Basilisk II is an m68k Mac emulator rather than ppc. It
sounds like the application needed is ppc native.
Brad Boyer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To U
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, Christian Jaeger wrote:
> J�r�me Warnier wrote:
> > Just install Mac OS 9 directly under your qemu VM.
>
> Really? Doesn't qemu only emulate PC hardware (except for the cpu)? For linux
> that shouldn't matter as you could presumably compile the PC hardware drivers
> into a ppc
Adrian Zaugg wrote:
Hi Christian
You may run pearpc and mol,
You mean running a linux system inside pearpc and from there run MOL
(the same way I suggested with qemu)? Would you recommend pearpc over
qemu for that purpose?
SheepShaver or Basilisk II.
Basilisk II won't run Mac OS 9, fro
Jérôme Warnier wrote:
Christian Jaeger wrote:
Jérôme Warnier wrote:
Just my .2c: Both applications also exist for Windows, and probably
run nicely under WINE.
Yes, I've thought about this, too, but I'd have to get a copy of
those apps only for the purpose of the conversion; also I was still
Christian Jaeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> (c) PearPC
> http://pearpc.sourceforge.net/faq.html says "Can I run Mac OS 9.x.y?
> So far no one has succeeded in doing that. Have a look at the forums."
> and I didn't find something relevant in the forums when I looked.
Hmm I'm pretty sure I saw
Jérôme Warnier wrote:
Just my .2c: Both applications also exist for Windows, and probably
run nicely under WINE.
Yes, I've thought about this, too, but I'd have to get a copy of those
apps only for the purpose of the conversion; also I was still using
FileMaker 4. Also there might be further
Julien BLACHE wrote:
(c) PearPC
http://pearpc.sourceforge.net/faq.html says "Can I run Mac OS 9.x.y? So
far no one has succeeded in doing that. Have a look at the forums." and
I didn't find something relevant in the forums when I looked.
Christian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT
Christian Jaeger wrote:
Jérôme Warnier wrote:
Just my .2c: Both applications also exist for Windows, and probably
run nicely under WINE.
Yes, I've thought about this, too, but I'd have to get a copy of those
apps only for the purpose of the conversion; also I was still using
FileMaker 4. Als
Hi Christian
You may run pearpc and mol, SheepShaver or Basilisk II. You can get more
info from
http://www.macosxhints.com/article.php?story=20060509180914879&lsrc=osxh
about the latter two.
Easiest would be to get an old mac from someone...
Best Regards, Adrian.
Christian Jaeger wrote:
Christian Jaeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What are you using for running Mac OS 9 (*) on a x86-64 machine? It
> seems there are only two ways:
> (a) running a ppc linux kernel with MOL under QEMU, run Mac OS inside MOL.
> (b) running SheepShaver
(c) PearPC
JB.
--
Julien BLACHE - Debian &
Christian Jaeger wrote:
Hello
What are you using for running Mac OS 9 (*) on a x86-64 machine? It
seems there are only two ways:
(a) running a ppc linux kernel with MOL under QEMU, run Mac OS inside MOL.
(b) running SheepShaver
Any good/bad experiences with either of those or other ways?
(I
Hello
What are you using for running Mac OS 9 (*) on a x86-64 machine? It
seems there are only two ways:
(a) running a ppc linux kernel with MOL under QEMU, run Mac OS inside MOL.
(b) running SheepShaver
Any good/bad experiences with either of those or other ways?
(I need to get at some old F
22 matches
Mail list logo
