Re: Segfault compiling kernels: solved!

2002-01-21 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > > > make3.79.1-10 testing > > > ^ > > > exactly what I rebuilt today... > > > > > > > libc6 2.2.4-7 testing > > > > fileutils 4.1-9 testing > > > > > > I can't check (box at work), but probably exactly the same. The

Re: Segfault compiling kernels: solved!

2002-01-21 Thread Michel Lanners
This electronic message is not binding on its sender nor on Cetrel S.C. Any use of information of this mail except the use by the addressee within his or her business relation with Cetrel is strictly forbidden CETREL S.C. L-2956 Luxembourg; Tel: 00352 35566-1; http://www.cetrel.lu

Re: Segfault compiling kernels: solved!

2002-01-08 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > make3.79.1-10 testing > ^ > exactly what I rebuilt today... > > > libc6 2.2.4-7 testing > > fileutils 4.1-9 testing > > I can't check (box at work), but probably exactly the same. These I recall a new build of ma

Re: Segfault compiling kernels: solved!

2002-01-07 Thread Colin Walters
On Mon, 2002-01-07 at 14:00, Michel Lanners wrote: > OK, I tried other memory DIMMs: no dice. I then tried to recompile make > locally: that worked! (rebuilt the .deb, in fact). A few weeks ago, after a dist-upgrade, I was getting just segfaults from gnome-session. I tried debugging it, but it wa

Re: Segfault compiling kernels: solved!

2002-01-07 Thread Michel Lanners
On 7 Jan, this message from Michel Dänzer echoed through cyberspace: > On Mon, 2002-01-07 at 20:00, Michel Lanners wrote: >> So, the question that remains is: why on earth am I the only that one >> whose make segfaults when building kernels? What is wrong (if anything) >> with woody's make packag

Re: Segfault compiling kernels: solved!

2002-01-07 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mon, 2002-01-07 at 20:00, Michel Lanners wrote: > Hey all, > > >>> I'd run the command that segfaults directly, if I knew which one? Hm, > >>> make -n comes to mind... I'll have to see what that gives. > >> > >> -n won't do anything so I'm not sure it'll act just as make (in case > >> targets

Re: Segfault compiling kernels: solved!

2002-01-07 Thread Michel Lanners
Hey all, >>> I'd run the command that segfaults directly, if I knew which one? Hm, >>> make -n comes to mind... I'll have to see what that gives. >> >> -n won't do anything so I'm not sure it'll act just as make (in case >> targets get updated). Add a few echo "yadda" around the makefile to see >

Re: Segfault compiling kernels

2002-01-02 Thread Michel Lanners
On 2 Jan, this message from Michael Schmitz echoed through cyberspace: >> So the segfault happens between make recursion depth changes (that's >> what's in brackets, right?). I tried running make under gdb, but since >> it spawns another make (which spawns another one), those childs are not >> ru

Re: Segfault compiling kernels

2002-01-02 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > Rebuild that (make distclean should throw away mkdep IIRC). > > Done. Same thing. On second glance it appears the segfault wasn't from mkdep, sorry to get you on the wrong track. > So the segfault happens between make recursion depth changes (that's > what's in brackets, right?). I tried runn

Re: Segfault compiling kernels

2002-01-01 Thread Michel Lanners
On 28 Dec, this message from Michael Schmitz echoed through cyberspace: >> > > make[1]: *** [fastdep] Segmentation fault >> > > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux/arch/ppc/boot' >> > > make: *** [archdep] Error 2 >> > > >> > > It seems make is to blame here?? > > Might as well be mkdep: >

Re: Segfault compiling kernels

2001-12-28 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Fri, 2001-12-28 at 18:01, Michel Lanners wrote: > > What kernel are you running? > > Either 2.2.19 (Debian install kernel) or 2.2.18-presomething (LinuxPPC 2000 > Q4 install kernel). I assume those should be solid, or there would be more reports of this kind. > > Spurious segfaults can onl

Re: Segfault compiling kernels

2001-12-28 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > > make[1]: *** [fastdep] Segmentation fault > > > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux/arch/ppc/boot' > > > make: *** [archdep] Error 2 > > > > > > It seems make is to blame here?? Might as well be mkdep: fastdep: dummy $(TOPDIR)/scripts/mkdep $(CFLAGS) $(EXTRA_CFLAGS) -- $(wild

Re: Segfault compiling kernels

2001-12-28 Thread Michel Lanners
Hi all, > On Fri, 2001-12-28 at 17:37, Michel Lanners wrote: > > I have done a new install of Debian 'woody' on a beige G3 here at work. > > Some slight > > quirks on install, but it generally works. > > > > However, I tried to compile kernels, and all I get is segfaults: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: Segfault compiling kernels

2001-12-28 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Fri, 2001-12-28 at 17:37, Michel Lanners wrote: > I have done a new install of Debian 'woody' on a beige G3 here at work. Some > slight > quirks on install, but it generally works. > > However, I tried to compile kernels, and all I get is segfaults: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/linux$ make

Segfault compiling kernels

2001-12-28 Thread Michel Lanners
Hi, I have done a new install of Debian 'woody' on a beige G3 here at work. Some slight quirks on install, but it generally works. However, I tried to compile kernels, and all I get is segfaults: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/linux$ make dep gcc -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -