On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 22:58, Marius Groeger wrote:
> FWIW, CONFIG_PREEMPT _does_ reduce the avarage scheduling latency.
> It's still sort of soft real-time, but the effect is measurable (I'm
> talking 2.4 kernels here, BTW) However, on desktop systems you
> probably don need to worry about this,
On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 22:58, Marius Groeger wrote:
> FWIW, CONFIG_PREEMPT _does_ reduce the avarage scheduling latency.
> It's still sort of soft real-time, but the effect is measurable (I'm
> talking 2.4 kernels here, BTW) However, on desktop systems you
> probably don need to worry about this, b
On Fri, 21 May 2004, Lee Braiden wrote:
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> > Yah, well... CONFIG_PREEMPT gives you all the problems of SMP without
> > any benefit so :)
>
> Well, I know people argue about that, but I think it was you who advised
> me to avoid PREEMPT before, so I'll take you
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Yah, well... CONFIG_PREEMPT gives you all the problems of SMP without
any benefit so :)
Well, I know people argue about that, but I think it was you who advised
me to avoid PREEMPT before, so I'll take your word for it.
But... what you said above was exact
On Thu, 2004-05-20 at 21:48, Lee Braiden wrote:
> But I quit doing that at some point, after someone (authoritative, but I
> can't remember the details) pointed out that it added complexity,
> debugging issues, etc. Given that I *already* have problems with PPC
> kernels -- latency/lockups, (pree
Jens Schmalzing wrote:
SMP kernels run
fine on single processor machines. I have repeatedly been told,
however, that this bears a considerable performance hit on some
hardware. Can anybody confirm or deny this? Even small hints would
be appreciated.
A long time ago, I used to compile SMP i
Hi,
putting together another release of the Debian kernel image packages,
I am wondering whether we could get rid of half the packages by simply
not supplying single processor flavours - after all, SMP kernels run
fine on single processor machines. I have repeatedly been told,
however, that this
7 matches
Mail list logo