On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 06:36:02AM -0500, vinai wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Oct 2005, [iso-8859-1] Rogério Brito wrote:
>
> >The problem is that the kernel compiles bombs when we include CUDA
> >support, but exclude PMU support (which, AFAIK, oldworlds don't
> >have---please let me know if I am wrong here)
On Sat, 8 Oct 2005, [iso-8859-1] Rogério Brito wrote:
The problem is that the kernel compiles bombs when we include CUDA
support, but exclude PMU support (which, AFAIK, oldworlds don't
have---please let me know if I am wrong here).
Have you seen this? Would you like further details?
Hey Folks
On Sat, 2005-10-08 at 00:04 -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
> Hi, Ben.
>
> I don't know if you've seen the messages that I've been exchanging with
> Sven, but it seems that both of us are having problems with getting
> recent kernels compiled with the least amount of options possible, for
> generating
On Sat, 2005-10-08 at 00:04 -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
> Hi, Ben.
>
> I don't know if you've seen the messages that I've been exchanging with
> Sven, but it seems that both of us are having problems with getting
> recent kernels compiled with the least amount of options possible, for
> generating
Hi, Ben.
I don't know if you've seen the messages that I've been exchanging with
Sven, but it seems that both of us are having problems with getting
recent kernels compiled with the least amount of options possible, for
generating miboot floppies where the kernel would fit.
The problem is that th
5 matches
Mail list logo
