Rogério Brito wrote:
> Use the "route -n" command to see if you have a route with
> destination of 0.0.0.0 and with the gateway/router set to your
> PPP peer.
>
> If yes, then you're already done with the default route. If
> not, then you have to tell pppd
Rogerio and MIchel,
Thanks for your answers. There was a post on user by someone
who found things routed to eth0 when they needed to be going to
ttyS0, which is what got me thinking about default route. I will try
Rogerio's answer and if still lost try the user list. Also, in reference
to Rogeri
On Oct 15 2001, mmissett wrote:
> Thanks for the reply, I was beginning to feel ignored. And thinking
> of the other lists. In any event, yes, I can ping the PPP peer
> (numerically), but not anybody else. I have been wondering about
> default route, but I don't know what to do about it.
On Tue, 2001-10-16 at 02:54, mmissett wrote:
> I can ping the PPP peer (numerically), but not anybody else. I have
> been wondering about default route, but I don't know what to do about it.
Configure pppd to set it, if the 'default' option doesn't work then
please read up some documentation.
Michel,
Thanks for the reply, I was beginning to feel ignored. And thinking
of the other lists. In any event, yes, I can ping the PPP peer (numerically),
but not anybody else. I have been wondering about
default route, but I don't know what to do about it. If you could
provide some advice on
On Sun, 2001-10-14 at 03:31, mmissett wrote:
> I seem to have the IP connection happening (to judge from plog), but
> am unable to connect to anywhere (to judge from ping) whether I use
> the URL (which gives me unknown host) or the numerical designation
> (which gives me x packets sent, 0 packets
6 matches
Mail list logo
