On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 17:52 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 05:33:24PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 12:16:38PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > > > $ more /proc/fb
> > > > > 0 ATI Radeon Lf
> > > >
> > > > 0 OFfb ATY,264LTP
> > > > 1 OFfb ATY,264LTP
>
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 05:33:24PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 12:16:38PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > > $ more /proc/fb
> > > > 0 ATI Radeon Lf
> > >
> > > 0 OFfb ATY,264LTP
> > > 1 OFfb ATY,264LTP
> >
> > Might be the LCD is actually on the second one?
>
> This mi
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 12:16:38PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > $ more /proc/fb
> > > 0 ATI Radeon Lf
> >
> > 0 OFfb ATY,264LTP
> > 1 OFfb ATY,264LTP
>
> Might be the LCD is actually on the second one?
This might be the reason it fails, if it is so. But i am not sure, since the
dmesg outpu
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 09:58 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> My diagnostic here, is that g-i makes some assumptions that are wrong
> on
> powerpc. Most probably it tries to load the vesafb module, but since
> the above
> is builtin in the powerpc kernel, that test fails, obviously.
> Furthermore,
> vesa
> > $ more /proc/fb
> > 0 ATI Radeon Lf
>
> 0 OFfb ATY,264LTP
> 1 OFfb ATY,264LTP
Might be the LCD is actually on the second one?
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 09:53:53AM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 08:23 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 12:17:10AM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > > 0 OFfb ATY,264LTP
> > > 1 OFfb ATY,264LTP
> >
> > Ok, this is atyfb, and you probably have a rage
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 08:23 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 12:17:10AM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > 0 OFfb ATY,264LTP
> > 1 OFfb ATY,264LTP
>
> Ok, this is atyfb, and you probably have a rage something chip in there. I
> wonder about the two fbdevs, but i suppose this is
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 12:17:10AM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 23:53 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 04:01:17PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 15:28 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > What framebuffer is used ? atyfb prob
On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 23:53 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 04:01:17PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 15:28 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > What framebuffer is used ? atyfb probably ?
> >
> > I don't really know. I used video=ofonly but it doesnt hel
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 04:01:17PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 15:28 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > What framebuffer is used ? atyfb probably ?
>
> I don't really know. I used video=ofonly but it doesnt help.
> I can login on terminal 4, and it seems that there are no f
On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 15:28 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> What framebuffer is used ? atyfb probably ?
I don't really know. I used video=ofonly but it doesnt help.
I can login on terminal 4, and it seems that there are no fb module (at
least find /lib/module/2.6.16-powerpc-1 -name '*fb*' outputs not
Hey Sven,
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 03:33:28PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> I think i remember that we had some special
> casing for radeonfb/powerpc somewhere.
I do remember you and Attilio talking about of sort of database for
handling the various situations.
The best I could come up with is this
This one seems to have lost debian-boot, sending there.
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 12:04:05PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 08:39 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 08:58:06PM +0300, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> > > On 5/3/06, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 12:04:05PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 08:39 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 08:58:06PM +0300, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> > > On 5/3/06, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >FYI, the daily sid_d-i CD builds are working
On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 08:39 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 08:58:06PM +0300, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> > On 5/3/06, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >FYI, the daily sid_d-i CD builds are working again for powerpc. Sorry
> > >for the long hiatus here! Among other things
On 5/15/06, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 08:58:06PM +0300, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> On 5/3/06, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >FYI, the daily sid_d-i CD builds are working again for powerpc. Sorry
> >for the long hiatus here! Among other things, those o
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 08:58:06PM +0300, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> On 5/3/06, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >FYI, the daily sid_d-i CD builds are working again for powerpc. Sorry
> >for the long hiatus here! Among other things, those of you with tg3
> >network cards should be able to use
On 5/3/06, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
FYI, the daily sid_d-i CD builds are working again for powerpc. Sorry
for the long hiatus here! Among other things, those of you with tg3
network cards should be able to use these.
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arc
18 matches
Mail list logo
